On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:32 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:03 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
Setting volume above 1.0 can be very useful if the original is too quiet.
For example, Quicktime allows a volume of 300% to amplify quiet tracks
On May 31, 2010 11:30 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:17:03 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com
I don't think that is possible in the way that the volume attribute is
currently defined as a value between [0;1]. That is an orthogonal, but
still important question about the volume attribute then.
So, if you say 300%, I assume you mean 3 times louder than what the
track is given as? I do
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:52 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I don't think that is possible in the way that the volume attribute is
currently defined as a value between [0;1]. That is an orthogonal, but
still important question about the volume attribute then.
So, if you say 300%, I assume you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:52 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I don't think that is possible in the way that the volume attribute is
currently defined as a value between [0;1]. That is an orthogonal, but
still
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:03 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:52 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I don't think that is possible in the way that the
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:03 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:52 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:33:45 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:17:03 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:33:45 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just came across a curious situation
On 5/31/10, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:48 AM, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/31/10, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:48 AM, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and
On 2010-06-01 13:09, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
On 5/31/10, Silvia Pfeiffersilviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not aware of a CSS property for media elements that lets you
control the muted state. Can you link me to a specification?
Well, http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/aural.html defines volume
On 6/1/10 7:09 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
Also @media aural {display: none;} can be used on audio elements
but I haven't read the specs properly so I don't know if that would hide
anvideo element when inside of an @media aural clause.
You seem to be somewhat confused about the way media
References: aanlktilyqfgvi5azyr4zpxjiqctl7gickfhzpev6g...@mail.gmail.com
4c0420c9.d345d80a.5c04.d...@mx.google.com
aanlktimlhyxmzs7ujxsuacaj90dufk3advpej3uo1...@mail.gmail.com
aanlktin3iq_ahiwwuwam6hevnss1rxal17g3zj9yn...@mail.gmail.com
Bjartur Thorlacius
Hi,
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that an author who is creating an audio-visual
Webpage has to use JavaScript to turn down (or up) the loudness of
their media
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that an author who is creating an audio-visual
Webpage has to use JavaScript to turn down (or up) the loudness of
their media elements
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that an author who is creating an audio-visual
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:48 AM, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that an author who is creating an audio-visual
Webpage has to use
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not
On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:33:45 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just came across a curious situation in the spec: IIUC, it seems the
@volume and @muted attributes are only IDL attributes and not content
attributes. This means that an author who is creating an
20 matches
Mail list logo
