On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Eitan Adler wrote:
A lot of websites let you upload either from a file on your hard drive
or from a link on the web. Most of the time this is done by having two
different inputs: One for a file and the other for a URL.
If there were some type of input like upload'
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I think it might make sense to expose file upload progress on a form
to a same-origin server. It would be interesting to see how the equivalent
feature in XMLHttpRequest is received before we add this, though.
I've made a note
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I think it might make sense to expose file upload progress on a form
to a same-origin server. It would be interesting to see how the equivalent
feature in XMLHttpRequest is received before we add this, though.
I've made a note
[mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org]
On Behalf Of Eitan Adler
Sent: 08 June 2010 17:10
To: Lachlan Hunt
Cc: wha...@whatwg.org; Simpson, Grant Leyton
Subject: Re: [whatwg] input type=upload (not just files) proposal
My understanding of the proposal is that given this particular control, the
browser
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Rob Evans r...@mtn-i.com wrote:
I think an interesting addition to the input type=upload would be a
script-accessible progress value.
Either as a percentage, or probably more useful two values, one being the
size of the upload and
the other being current
selection
inside a single element however I would never have noticed anyway as I shun IE
and avoid it like the plague.
-Original Message-
From: James Salsman [mailto:jsals...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 June 2010 13:47
To: Rob Evans; whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] input type=upload
A lot of websites let you upload either from a file on your hard drive
or from a link on the web.
Most of the time this is done by having two different inputs: One for
a file and the other for a URL.
If there were some type of input like upload' which will allow for
any complete input.
Something
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the file://
scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide a choice
between selecting local files and entering an http/ftp url?
On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
It would then be the server's
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Simpson, Grant Leyton
glsim...@indiana.edu wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the
file:// scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide a
choice between selecting local files and entering an http/ftp
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:37 -0400, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the
file:// scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide a
choice between selecting local files and entering an http/ftp url?
On Jun 8,
O.K. Just wanted to clarify. With this sort of dialog in mind, I like your
proposal. (I find it unrealistic to think that the average user would write out
file://... but maybe I am mistaken.)
However, I see one possible issue. Some apps provide the means to work with
local files, URLs, and
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:37 -0400, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the
file:// scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide
On 2010-06-08 16:37, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including
the file:// scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box
to provide a choice between selecting local files and entering an
http/ftp url?
My understanding of the
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:58 -0400, Mike Shaver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:37 -0400, Simpson, Grant Leyton
wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Yes, and the rest of my email said that.
Sorry, I am not familiar with KIO, and didn't see the need for OS support.
KIO slaves on KDE work just like that. It's not something that I think a
user agent can
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 11:13 -0400, Mike Shaver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
Yes, and the rest of my email said that.
Sorry, I am not familiar with KIO, and didn't see the need for OS
support.
KIO
My understanding of the proposal is that given this particular control, the
browser would provide an interface for either selecting a local file or
entering a URL. If a file is selected, the file is uploaded as normal,
equivalent to input type=file name=foo.
Otherwise, if a URL is entered,
17 matches
Mail list logo
