On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:21:20 + (UTC), Ian Hickson wrote:
(I've made the characters not allowed in XML also not allowed in HTML,
with the exception of some of the space characters which we need to
have allowed for legacy reasons.)
The
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:21:20 + (UTC), Ian Hickson wrote:
(I've made the characters not allowed in XML also not allowed in HTML,
with the exception of some of the space characters which we need to have
allowed for legacy reasons.)
The C1 character U+0085 NEXT LINE (NEL) is also a Unicode
Dnia 29-02-2008, Pt o godzinie 01:21 +, Ian Hickson pisze:
In 8.2.2.4, I have no idea what's the reason or purpose of point 1,
which reads If the new encoding is UTF-16, change it to UTF-8.. I
suspect some misunderstanding.
This is required because many pages are labelled as
On 29 Feb 2008, at 01:21, Ian Hickson wrote:
- Again there, shouldn't we be given unicode codepoints for that (as
it'll be a unicode string)?
Not sure what you mean.
This is just me being incredibly dumb. Ignore it.
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
The draft says:
A
