Am 07.09.2012 03:36 schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.:
This email is an extension of the thread started at
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-August/036953.html
by John Mellor, distilling the core problem he has into a more
easily-understood and digested form.
The srcset attribute,
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:07:30 +0200, Fred Andrews freda...@live.com wrote:
From: jackalm...@gmail.com
...
I'm not sure how best to solve this, but John Mellor suggested
allowing the specification of the image's native dimensions somehow.
That way, the browser could know that the 1600.jpg
From: sim...@opera.com
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:07:30 +0200, Fred Andrews freda...@live.com wrote:
From: jackalm...@gmail.com
...
I'm not sure how best to solve this, but John Mellor suggested
allowing the specification of the image's native dimensions somehow.
That way, the
On 9/6/12 6:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following example:
img srcset=800.jpg 1x, 1600.jpg 2x style=width: 100%; height: auto;
For a screen that's somewhere near 800px wide, this works just fine.
However, a 1x screen 1600px wide (not too uncommon - I think a
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Hans Muller hmul...@adobe.com wrote:
On 9/6/12 6:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following example:
img srcset=800.jpg 1x, 1600.jpg 2x style=width: 100%; height: auto;
For a screen that's somewhere near 800px wide, this works just
This email is an extension of the thread started at
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-August/036953.html
by John Mellor, distilling the core problem he has into a more
easily-understood and digested form.
The srcset attribute, as currently written, is not friendly to large
From: jackalm...@gmail.com
...
I'm not sure how best to solve this, but John Mellor suggested
allowing the specification of the image's native dimensions somehow.
That way, the browser could know that the 1600.jpg image is
appropriate to serve as an 800px wide high-dpi image, or a 1600px
