On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:56:03 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
In current Opera and Firefox the timeline is always normalized to
start at 0, so the time that corresponds to 0 in the original
timeline would be at a negative currentTime.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:56:03 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
In current Opera and Firefox the timeline is always normalized
to start at 0, so the time that corresponds to 0 in the
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:25:01 +0200, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
AFAIK, no browser supports any format for video that does not have
timestamps.
I have patches being reviewed that add support for
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:13:12 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
It could also do with a good example. The spec says:
If the media resource specifies an explicit start time and date,
then that time and date should be considered the
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
In current Opera and Firefox the timeline is always normalized to
start at 0, so the time that corresponds to 0 in the original
timeline would be at a negative currentTime.
I still don't really understand what you mean by start here.
Thanks for the spec changes, startDate is now in a state where I'd be
happy to implement it! More comments inline:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:21:43 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:16:40 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
It could also do with a good example. The spec says:
If the media resource specifies an explicit start time and date,
then that time and date should be considered the zero point in the
media timeline; the timeline offset will be
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
AFAIK, no browser supports any format for video that does not have
timestamps.
I have patches being reviewed that add support for using MediaStreams as
video sources. These do not have timestamps.
Rob
--
“You have
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:16:40 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
I suggest the property offsetTime, defined as the stream time in
seconds which currentTime and duration are relative to.
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:40:26 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
let me first try to summarize what I think the spec says:
* currentTime need not start at 0, for streams it will typically
represent for how long the server has been serving a stream.
* duration is not the
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:16:40 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
(Oops, sorry. Missed these e-mails in my earlier reply.)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal
odi...@opera.com wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com
wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the spec[5] and old emails and got confused
myself. It hasn't been implemented after almost 2 years.
We (Opera)
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:11:06 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
As hinted above, I don't think that startOffsetTime should really be the
first choice for trying to sync live streams. However, knowing the date
of a video is still useful, potentially even for the streaming
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:50:41 +0100, Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen
ingar.arnt...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my reasoning. The progress value that is visualized in the video
element (i.e. currentTime) is part of the end-user experience. For this
reason it is important that it communicates the appropriate
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the spec[5] and old emails and got confused
myself. It hasn't been implemented after almost 2 years.
Can you elaborate on how it's confusing? I don't
(Oops, sorry. Missed these e-mails in my earlier reply.)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal
odi...@opera.com wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the
Thanks for putting this together Odin -- this has long been a point of
interest for all of us on the Popcorn.js dev team.
Rick
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain it,
and yesterday I
17 matches
Mail list logo
