On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Biju wrote:
Matthew Gregan wrote in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822 :
Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame. Safari 5 and Chrome
6 fire every 250ms. Opera 10.50 fires every 200ms.
Now in firefox bug 571822 they are changing Firefox
On 9/11/10 8:56 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
I can't recall any browsers exposing vsync. (does any?)
Gecko is working on it. See
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2010/08/mozrequestanima.html
-Boris
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
I think an ideal API for video frame processing would
On 2010-09-11 05:23, Eric Carlson wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Biju wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally: What use case did you have in mind, Biju ?
I was thinking about applications like
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame.
Safari 5 and Chrome 6 fire every 250ms. Opera 10.50 fires every 200ms.
Now in firefox bug 571822 they are changing
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame.
Safari 5 and Chrome 6 fire every
If I understand correctly... I think we would be using this a lot in
transmedia integration for film/tv.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28
On 9/10/10 10:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I don't know how audio would be returned, though.
Mozilla is using a typed array buffer holding 32-bit floats for its
audio data API stuff, I believe.
-Boris
On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox fires the timeupdate event
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
The problem with a 'newFrame' callback is what to do if the callback
takes longer than the duration of a single frame. Does the video engine
start dropping frames, or does the video lag?
Dropping frames would be the better
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
The problem with a 'newFrame' callback is what to do if the callback
takes longer than the duration of a single frame. Does the video engine
start dropping frames, or does the
I think an ideal API for video frame processing would involve handing video
frames to a Worker for processing.
Rob
--
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I think an ideal API for video frame processing would involve handing video
frames to a Worker for processing.
Mm, yeah, probably. But then you'd need to be able to do canvas on
workers, and hand the data back...
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally: What use case did you have in mind, Biju ?
I was thinking about applications like
https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml
(
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Biju wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally: What use case did you have in mind, Biju ?
I was thinking about applications like
https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml
(
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
I think an ideal API for video frame processing would involve handing
video
frames to a Worker for processing.
Mm, yeah, probably.
17 matches
Mail list logo