1. The signature of manifest is ^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST[ \t]*$. Since
arbitrary whitespace is allowed at the end, it is not possible to
verify it with a simple binary comparison, yet it unnecessarily
forbids e.g. comments at the end.
I suggest changing the signature to ^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST -
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, ROBO Design wrote:
I believe this is way too much to ask/suggest for Web Applications 1.0
(maybe 2.0). AFAIK, this is beyond the purpose of WA 1.0.
Here it goes:
1. Add a special frame tag which displays live image data from the
client web cams, TV tuners,
In 2006 I proposed the following spec for a spellcheck= attribute,
based on requests from the Google engineers then working on Firefox:
http://www.damowmow.com/playground/spellcheck.txt
The same engineers have since implemented this feature in Chrome also, and
Google does use this
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:38:42 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
In 2006 I proposed the following spec for a spellcheck= attribute,
based on requests from the Google engineers then working on Firefox:
http://www.damowmow.com/playground/spellcheck.txt
The same engineers have since
On 30 Dec 2008, at 11:38, Ian Hickson wrote:
In 2006 I proposed the following spec for a spellcheck= attribute,
based on requests from the Google engineers then working on Firefox:
http://www.damowmow.com/playground/spellcheck.txt
The same engineers have since implemented this feature in
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
[In IE] The DOM property HTMLInputElement.indeterminate is supported for
input type=checkbox
I've reluctantly added this to the spec.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A
On Dec 30, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:38:42 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
In 2006 I proposed the following spec for a spellcheck= attribute,
based on requests from the Google engineers then working on Firefox:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:38:42 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
In 2006 I proposed the following spec for a spellcheck= attribute,
based on requests from the
On 30.12.2008, at 13:45, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
I have therefore not added this feature to HTML5 for the time
being. If
there is more interest in this feature, please speak up.
This seems stupid. If I want to have spell-checking, let me. Don't
force it off. I don't see any reason to
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
1. The signature of manifest is ^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST[ \t]*$. Since
arbitrary whitespace is allowed at the end, it is not possible to verify it
with a simple binary comparison, yet it unnecessarily forbids e.g. comments
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote:
It's useful for fields that contain non-textual content, e.g. product ID,
license plate number, CAPTCHA answer, etc.
Browser would mark these as misspelt, which might be confusing or at least
distracting.
this sounds
Dec 30, 2008, в 7:09 PM, timeless написал(а):
I suggest changing the signature to ^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST - then
it will
be easier to verify, and it will be possible to add comments at the
end.
This is how we have it in WebKit now, and changing the check to the
more
strict HTML5 one may
2008/12/30 timeless timel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net
wrote:
It's useful for fields that contain non-textual content, e.g. product ID,
license plate number, CAPTCHA answer, etc.
Browser would mark these as misspelt, which might be
2008/12/30 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
Dec 30, 2008, в 7:09 PM, timeless написал(а):
I suggest changing the signature to ^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST - then it
will
be easier to verify, and it will be possible to add comments at the end.
This is how we have it in WebKit now, and changing
2008/12/31 timeless timel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net
wrote:
It's useful for fields that contain non-textual content, e.g. product ID,
license plate number, CAPTCHA answer, etc.
Browser would mark these as misspelt, which might be
2008/12/31 Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com
2008/12/30 timeless timel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net
wrote:
It's useful for fields that contain non-textual content, e.g. product
ID,
license plate number, CAPTCHA answer, etc.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Shannon wrote:
Either way I would recommend making a decision on minimum and maximum
integer values an using them consistently. If not I can imagine the
rapid adoption of 64-bit systems will cause
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Shannon wrote:
Either way I would recommend making a decision on minimum and maximum
integer values an using them consistently. If not
Robert O'Callahan ha scritto:
2008/12/31 Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com
mailto:scampa.giova...@gmail.com
2008/12/30 timeless timel...@gmail.com mailto:timel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kornel Lesiński
kor...@geekhood.net
Calogero Alex Baldacchino ha scritto:
The language to check might be choosen from several sources, such as
the 'lang' attribute of the contenteditable element itself, if
different from the document language. For instance, a blog editor's
interface document might not be translated in a
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Shannon wrote:
Either way I would recommend making a decision on minimum and maximum
Dec 31, 2008, в 3:52 AM, Jonas Sicking написал(а):
this means we could never do:
^BOM?CACHE MANIFEST2
If incompatible changes to the format are ever needed, we can change
Content-Type.
Ugh, depending on the content-type for things like versioning would
suck, people have a hard time
22 matches
Mail list logo