On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
In practice, I think the only way to avoid this problem is for
browsers to implement content-sniffing techniques of some kind to
figure out the language, at least per field but ideally on a
word-by-word basis. If
Peter Kasting ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Calogero Alex Baldacchino
alex.baldacch...@email.it mailto:alex.baldacch...@email.it wrote:
Why not to let the user choose the language, as it happens in word
processors? A UA can't choose accurately whether, for instance,
Probably. However, establishing that the lang attribute is the
first-choice language to check (which wouldn't prevent the UA from
providing other choices, or just ignoring such behaviour due to a
user preference, or using other dictionaries too -- and that might
be suggested in a note on
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Michael Nordman wrote:
Fwi, this piece of functionality may warrant some actual consideration.
I think this would add very little complexity to the spec and
implementations, but would add a great deal of value. Big bang for
little buck.
Many applications that use
I'm trying to add video and audio tags to our XHtmlValidator and after
going through http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ I've
pieced together schemas for both, but wanted to ask if there was a
more authoritative source?
In particular, I came across a couple of event handlers
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, James Graham wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 15:00, Russell Leggett wrote:
I actually think that using custom microformat-like conventions with
classes or tags is really not as robust a solution as what is being
attempted with RDFa (I honestly
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Arne Claassen wrote:
I'm trying to add video and audio tags to our XHtmlValidator and after
going through http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ I've
pieced together schemas for both, but wanted to ask if there was a more
authoritative source?
Nope, that's
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Michael Nordman wrote:
Fwi, this piece of functionality may warrant some actual consideration.
I think this would add very little complexity to the spec and
implementations, but would add a great deal
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Michael Nordman wrote:
Thnx for the response Ian, much better than months of thundering
silence.
Sorry about that; the appcache feature was on the back burner for a few
months as I tried to get through the pile of old feedback.
I'm not yet sure we've come up with
Kornel Lesiński ha scritto:
Probably. However, establishing that the lang attribute is the
first-choice language to check (which wouldn't prevent the UA from
providing other choices, or just ignoring such behaviour due to a
user preference, or using other dictionaries too -- and that might be
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Arne Claassen ar...@mindtouch.com wrote:
In particular, I came across a couple of event handlers in examples that i
can't find defined anywhere in the specs, like ondataunavailable and
oncanshowcurrentframe
These are probably some of my examples that I wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo
