On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:21:33 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Here's what I would propose:
1. Empty string attributes for HTML elements specifying resources to
automatically download are considered
(resending to include the whatwg list, sorry for multiple postings)
Hi Olli,
Thank you for bringing this interesting thread to the Multimodal
Interaction Working Group's attention.
The working group is in fact very active. Although it is chartered as
W3C Member-only, we do have a public mailing
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:21:33 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Here's what I would propose:
1. Empty string attributes for HTML
Hello,
Has it been considered to pass more than JSON data to workers? I could not find
a rationale behind this in the FAQ, or in other places I looked. I understand
the need for separation because of concurrency issues, but aren't there other
ways to accomplish this?
(The following text was
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:26:59 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 12/16/09 9:23 AM, Jan Fabry wrote:
The Google Gears API seems to provide both createWorker(scriptText) and
createWorkerFromUrl(scriptUrl). Why was only the URL variant retained
in the Web Workers spec?
Does using
Looks like a good list to me.
-Nicholas
__
Commander Lock: Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe!
Morpheus: My beliefs do not require them to.
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent:
I'm not certain what a deep copy of the function means - would you need to
copy the entire lexical scope of the function? For example, let's say you do
this:
var foo = 1;
function setFoo(val) { foo = val; }
function getFoo() { return foo; }
worker.postMessage(setFoo);
Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:26:59 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu
wrote:
On 12/16/09 9:23 AM, Jan Fabry wrote:
The Google Gears API seems to provide both createWorker(scriptText)
and createWorkerFromUrl(scriptUrl). Why was only the URL variant
retained in the Web
[Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in the
archives.]
Why does pushState only prune forward session history entries corresponding
to the same document? I would have expected it to behave like a reference
fragment navigation, which prunes *all* forward session
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
[Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in the
archives.]
Why does pushState only prune forward session history entries corresponding
to the same document? I would have expected it to behave
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
[Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in
the
archives.]
Why does pushState only prune forward session history
I'd like some clarification on exactly when the ApplicationCache events should
fire. Specifically the events that are likely to fire early, such as the
checking or downloading events.
In 6.9.4 Downloading or updating an application cache, the specification
currently says the following for the
Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
[Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in the
archives.]
Why does pushState only prune forward session history entries corresponding
to the same document? I would have
On 16 Dec 2009, at 19:33, Drew Wilson wrote:
I'm not certain what a deep copy of the function means - would you need to
copy the entire lexical scope of the function? For example, let's say you do
this:
var foo = 1;
function setFoo(val) { foo = val; }
function getFoo() { return foo; }
On 12/16/09 1:27 PM, Jan Fabry wrote:
function setFoo(val) { foo = val; }
function getFoo() { return foo; }
...
After the second postMessage, the worker receives a new object, also a
function, bound to a variable with the value 1.
What if getFoo were:
function getFoo() { return
It would be really nice if the html5 spec supported a javascript call to
set a target window to fullscreen. The browser would then issue a
security warning at the top of the page (similar to pop-ups) and then
the user could grant that domain permission to go full-screen.
This is especially
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Michael Dale wrote:
It would be really nice if the html5 spec supported a javascript call to
set a target window to fullscreen. The browser would then issue a
security warning at the top of the page (similar to pop-ups) and then
the user could grant that domain
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I would have expected it to behave like a reference
fragment navigation, which prunes *all* forward session history entries.
I agree. I *think* what
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Michael Dale wrote:
It would be really nice if the html5 spec supported a javascript call to
set a target window to fullscreen. The browser would then issue a
security warning at the top of the page
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in the
browser chrome, it is much more discoverable when that capability exists
from within the content area (e.g. people are used to clicking on the full
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I would have expected it to behave like a reference
fragment navigation,
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in the
browser chrome, it is much more discoverable when that capability exists
from within the
2009/12/16 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again
is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in
the
browser chrome, it is much more discoverable
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
2009/12/16 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again
is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in
2009/12/16 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
2009/12/16 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over
again
is
that, while the UA
2009/12/17 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in the
browser chrome, it is much more discoverable when that capability exists
from within the
2009/12/16 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
2009/12/17 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com
I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again is
that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in the
browser chrome, it is much more
27 matches
Mail list logo
