On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com
wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the spec[5] and old emails and got confused
myself. It hasn't been implemented after almost 2 years.
We (Opera)
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:11:06 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
As hinted above, I don't think that startOffsetTime should really be the
first choice for trying to sync live streams. However, knowing the date
of a video is still useful, potentially even for the streaming
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:50:41 +0100, Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen
ingar.arnt...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my reasoning. The progress value that is visualized in the video
element (i.e. currentTime) is part of the end-user experience. For this
reason it is important that it communicates the appropriate
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the spec[5] and old emails and got confused
myself. It hasn't been implemented after almost 2 years.
Can you elaborate on how it's confusing? I don't
(Oops, sorry. Missed these e-mails in my earlier reply.)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0100, Odin Hørthe Omdal
odi...@opera.com wrote:
startOffsetTime seem to leave people confused, I often have to explain
it, and yesterday I read the
Thanks for commenting on my suggestion.
Bjartur Thorlacius wrote on 2012-03-07 23:53:
We should describe the security implications of lifting said
restrictions (if any) in the rationale document, for when someone is
burdened by these restrictions and can't figure if they were added
for erring
