On Jan 23, 2006, at 05:23, Ian Hickson wrote:
Probably the same as XML. Or maybe just !-- followed by zero or
more
characters other than U+, followed by --.
Of those two choices, I prefer the former. I don't like the idea of
expanding the set of conforming comments, because I think
Quoting Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think allowing paired double hyphens with whitespace in between
and allowing whitespace between the ending -- and would make
sense. This would improve the source-level upgradeability of valid
HTML 4 to conforming HTML 5. However, it would have the
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
AFAIK, document.write is not standardized anywhere at all (am I right?)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-DOM-Level-2-HTML-20011210/html.html#ID-75233634
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
On 1/23/06, Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:15:39 +0600, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-DOM-Level-2-HTML-20011210/html.html#ID-75233634
I'm surprised. document.write is defined but it's substantially different
from
http://webforms2.testsuite.org/
Most of the tests are inside the controls/ section. There need always need to
be more tests obviously. Currently it hosts a over two hundred test files if
I'm not mistaken, but not everything is covered yet. In elements/ some
elements are missing and some controls
Quoting Jim Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://webforms2.testsuite.org/
Most of the tests are inside the controls/ section. There need
always need to
be more tests obviously. Currently it hosts a over two hundred test files if
I'm not mistaken, but not everything is covered yet. In elements/ some
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Well that depends on the implementation and how SGML defines that such
erroneous comments be handled.
Indeed, there is that too. Whatever behaviour we require will be, to some
extent, new behaviour.
(Without a copy of IS0O-8879 handy, it's
On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:39, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I guess the XML style is the simplest thing that could work. :-/
You are talking about conformance, but what do you want the parser
to do?
I talked about conformance, because I'd prefer document conformance
be defined in such a way
From reading the current HTML5 spec, it seems like there is a need for
a new tag designed specifically for indicating selection of UI
elements. For purposes of this email, I'm going to call it x (for
lack of a decent name at the moment).
Currently, the spec recommends using kbdsamp for UI
