Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
Anyway, this is all a straw man -- this isn't the reason that the spec
doesn't allow this. It doesn't allow this because Safari didn't do it
this way in the first place, and changing it would likely introduce
bugs (while still
I don't think it's intuitive to support chaining only on those
methods that happen to return null right now.
dave
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
Anyway, this is all a straw man -- this isn't the reason that the
On Sunday 2006-07-02 22:47 +0200, Stefan Gössner wrote:
hmm ...
ctx.scale(2,1)
.rotate(Math.PI/4)
.translate(4,-6);
illustrates a sequence of manipulations semantically very well, doesn't it?
In my opinion, this pattern generally makes sense semantically when used
on immutable
- Original Message -
From: David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WHAT Working Group Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Håkon Wium Lie [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Vladimir Vukicevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Fedoniouk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Benjamin Joffe [EMAIL
Even without using |with|, why not just create a simple JS wrapper for
the context object that can have return-this or any other desired
semantics? This would avoid a change that would have some apps
require canvas 2D 2.0 or some such, and require authors to do
version checks to see which
