At 19:28 +0200 27/03/07, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
That is a matter of perception. Flash player which is the de-facto
standard at this point provides support on at least linux, windows and
Mac. We do risk that if this element is provided it could replace
Flash video with something that
At 20:30 +0200 27/03/07, Maik Merten wrote:
Actually the current audio draft requires user agents to support PCM
in a .wav container (that's way stronger than what can be found in the
video section). I guess your points apply there, too?
Yes, technically I think we should stay clean and
At 6:40 +1000 28/03/07, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 3/28/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really feel that the HTML spec. should say no more about video and
audio formats than it does about image formats (which is merely to give
examples), and we should strive
Dave Singer wrote:
Yes. I re-iterate; we have nothing aganist the Ogg or Theora codecs;
we just don't have a commercial reason to implement them, and we'd
rather not have the HTML spec. try to force the issue. It just gets
ugly (like the 3G exception).
But that's circular reasoning. We
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:57 +0900, Dave Singer wrote:
At 19:28 +0200 27/03/07, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
That is a matter of perception. Flash player which is the de-facto
standard at this point provides support on at least linux, windows and
Mac. We do risk that if this element is
On 3/28/07, Christian F.K. Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:57 +0900, Dave Singer wrote:
At 19:28 +0200 27/03/07, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
Apple has
neither power or desire to stop people implementing the video tag on
any platform, and indeed the whole point
On Mar 12, 2007, at 05:27, olivier Thereaux wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 02:15 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
The draft of my master's thesis is available for commenting at:
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/thesis/
Henri, congratulations on your work on the HTML conformance checker
and on the Thesis.
On Mar 27, 2007, at 23:40, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I would be curious for the reasons that 3GPP has taken the requirement
of vorbis out of the spec. Was that a decision based on technical
reasons and could you please explain what these technical reasons
were?
First: I don't know about what
Henri Sivonen schrieb:
When Nokia guys show up Open Source meetings, the FAQ about Maemo is why
they don't ship Vorbis support. The manager of the Maemo operation has
said that Nokia is afraid of Vorbis having some Fraunhofer-owned stuff
in it after all, so Nokia does not want to ship Vorbis
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:49:41 +0200, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider the following example:
script type=text/javascript defer
function ha8validate(p5event) { return true }
document.forms[0].onsubmit = ha8validate
/script
The script embedded here is so short and specific
Laurens Holst wrote:
As said, I tried a few things with embedding an image, video and SVG
with the object tag:
...
First of all, one annoying thing is that you have to provide sizes,
otherwise the object will not be visible.
At least in Mozilla, this is false for images. It should become
At 18:14 +0300 28/03/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Mar 27, 2007, at 23:40, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I would be curious for the reasons that 3GPP has taken the requirement
of vorbis out of the spec. Was that a decision based on technical
reasons and could you please explain what these technical
At 9:48 +0100 28/03/07, Gervase Markham wrote:
Dave Singer wrote:
Yes. I re-iterate; we have nothing aganist the Ogg or Theora
codecs; we just don't have a commercial reason to implement them,
and we'd rather not have the HTML spec. try to force the issue. It
just gets ugly (like the 3G
Laurens Holst wrote:
One of the main reasons that object is still broken on the web and why
embed needs to be used is Mozilla; their plugin finder doesn’t work
with object.
I'm sorry, but that's false. See my other post (under Re: video element
feedback) and
14 matches
Mail list logo
