2007/4/4, Martin Atkins:
* For cancel buttons where the server-side app just throws the
submitted form data away, it's pointless to validate it client-side.
Attach the cancel button to a distinct 'form' (eventually having the
same 'action' and 'method').
* Allowing the user to submit an
I understand that some here have reasons not to be happy with SMIL, but its
implementation within SVG really is quite nice and understandable. So far as
I can see, the discontent with it stems primarily from the fact SMIL seems
to have alternative specifications. Since the SVG implementation is
Benjamin -
On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Re: http://webkit.org/specs/HTML_Timed_Media_Elements.html
There are three things I'd hope to see from a video element:
1) Ease of use compared to object (A common API contributes to this,
and v2 might approach it with a
Common microsyntaxes for numbers allow leading whitespace and allow
trailing garbage. I understand why the algorithms for UAs other than
conformance checkers might be defined not to fail when there is
trailing garbage. However, to help authors catch typos, I think only
trailing whitespace
Why does tbody require one or more tr elements, as opposed to zero or
more?
http://www.whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/ has an empty tbody if you click
Remove.
--
Simon Pieters
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:41:21 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why does tbody require one or more tr elements, as opposed to zero
or more?
http://www.whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/ has an empty tbody if you click
Remove.
Also... since tables are allowed to have trs as direct
Following the discussion about the limitations of dialog, I
meditated about it a little and came up with the idea to generalize
things a little more.
When we have a dialog intermixed with actions and other events (like
ABC leaves the chat room), basically we have a sequential list of
Le 2007-04-05 à 10:36, Simon Pieters a écrit :
I get a 404 for this URI.
Oops... sorry.
http://www.michelf.com/documents/whatwg/sequential-list/
Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michelf.com/
On Apr 5, 2007, at 4:53 AM, ddailey wrote:
I understand that some here have reasons not to be happy with SMIL,
but its implementation within SVG really is quite nice and
understandable. So far as I can see, the discontent with it stems
primarily from the fact SMIL seems to have
Okay -- I guess that makes sense. thanks.
David
- Original Message -
From: Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ddailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vladimir Vukicevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Apple Proposal for
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
1. 'media-loop-count' is an awkward name, especially with The default
value of 1 means the item will play through once but will not loop.
We went through this with APNG, and ended up renaming that member. I
On Apr 5, 2007, at 20:44, Ian Hickson wrote:
The conformance requirements require the strings to be (e.g. in the
case
of floating point numbers) valid floating point number, which
doesn't
allow any spaces or non-numeric data, trailing or leading.
Oops. Sorry. Somehow I managed to miss
On 4/5/07, Vladimir Vukicevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
1. 'media-loop-count' is an awkward name, especially with The default
value of 1 means the item will play through once but will not loop.
We went through
At 09:54 +0200 UTC, on 2007-04-02, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:59:50 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Surely we're not trying to ensure that a Web page
is presented the same in every browsing environment? What would be the
use of that?
That's
At 16:20 +0200 UTC, on 2007-04-02, Thomas Broyer wrote:
2007/4/2, Asbjørn Ulsberg:
[...]
Should the HTML or CSS specification then encourage HTML and CSS authors
to use such a zapper to get expected visual results across browsers?
Why not, but such a zapper should then be given in the
At 12:52 +0200 UTC, on 2007-04-02, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:59:50 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[display: block and inline]
Defining preseantation up to *that* level is no problem IMO.
Great! Then let's.
The current (HTML 4) spec already does
At 03:18 -0400 UTC, on 2007-04-02, Mike Schinkel wrote:
Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
[...]
What exactly, in the context of presentation, would be good about
consistency
*across* UAs?
See Jakob's Law of Internet User Experience
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/2723.html
I fail to see the
Sorry for breaking into your realm, I just could not resist.
It seems that a recording that plays just once should have the loop-count
set to 0 (or left unspecified, of course). This means that the loop-count
attribute cannot be used to specify that the recording should not play at
all - which
Complex properties usually have their atomic counterparts in order that a
script can manipulate them conveniently. That means independence is not the
only factor here.
ChrisY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. David Baron
Sent: Thursday,
19 matches
Mail list logo
