On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:29:39 +0200, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I make HTML mail for (solicited) wide distribution, I make sure to
include alt text. It's becomes especially important when clients are
configured to automatically convert HTML mail to text (as indeed my
2007/4/19, Matthew Paul Thomas:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
...
For the various reasons discussed in this thread, I cannot think of a
real justification for making a mail client that breaks one of the
basic accessibility features that people understand better
On 4/19/07, Matthew Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it seems likely that the vast majority of non-spam e-mail messages
are sent to individuals who are known by the sender to be
fully-sighted. In that case putting up an interface for entering alt=
text, *just in case* the recipient gets
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:07:09 +0100, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As such, encouraging people to include alt tags means the difference
between me knowing that there's an image I care to look at and not.
If e-mail client automatically inserted [image was here] in the text part
of e-mail,
