Henri Sivonen wrote:
I understand your point about superfluity being defined by the
presentation (one could argue the same about relevance...). Aural CSS
seemed, at one point, like it would make sense for handling such
issues. However, since screen readers read the screen media styles,
it
On 1 Apr 2008, at 9:00 am, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Hmm … http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#hidden seems to be specified as
equivalent to visibility: hidden, a property that theoretically
shouldn't affect speech rendering but does (accidentally) hide
content from screen readers. It doesn't
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
On 1 Apr 2008, at 9:00 am, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Hmm … http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#hidden seems to be specified as
equivalent to visibility: hidden, a property that theoretically
shouldn't affect speech rendering but does (accidentally) hide content
from
On 1 Apr 2008, at 10:14 am, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
I know that everyone already knows this, but I think a reminder
might be timely:
Be careful not to confuse screen readers, who's job it is to read
what is displayed on the screen,
That's something of a
This is a proposal for semantic markup in HTML5.
Problem statement:
Modern web pages, especially those written for marketing purposes, often
include so-called buzzwords, or trend-leveraging verbal tokens. Markup for
them is needed both to achieve distinct visual rendering and to emphasize
Nicholas Shanks wrote:
Then I would call such software a screen reader + braille renderer +
hacks around in your OS program doing nasty things program. I don't
think a pure screen reader should know anything about CSS or DOM or an
application's internals.
Well, you could do that, but then
Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
The current standard for publishing media on the Web, in particular
consumer media, is Adobe Flash. This is the case not because of the
codecs inside Adobe Flash but because sites such as YouTube enable
consumers to publish media without having to worry about license fees
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:08:20 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I believe the current definition of the B element allows for such use:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-b
The b element represents a span of text to be stylistically offset from
the normal
On 01/04/2008, Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:08:20 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just my 2 cents for what they are worth. Also - it is very possible that
I don't understand, if so could you expand?
Taking into account the very
Robert J Crisler wrote:
From my perspective, and for what it's worth, I doubt that
the ideals of the W3C as expressed in 3.12.7.1 http://3.12.7.1 would
result in a situation that would be superior to simply letting the
international standards body for audio and video codecs deal with these
On 01/04/2008, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert J Crisler wrote:
From my perspective, and for what it's worth, I doubt that
the ideals of the W3C as expressed in 3.12.7.1 http://3.12.7.1 would
result in a situation that would be superior to simply letting the
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
This is a proposal for semantic markup in HTML5.
Problem statement:
Modern web pages, especially those written for marketing purposes,
often include so-called buzzwords, or trend-leveraging verbal
tokens. Markup for them is needed
12 matches
Mail list logo
