Chris DiBona writes:
this issue is actually not about submarined patents (more like
aircraft carrier patents) or tricky corner cases for the lgpl., but
that the internet users prefer more quality in their
codecs/megabyte/second.
I'm not so sure. YouTube is very popular despite the fact
It is impractical to convert video that was already compressed. My attempt
to convert QuickTime to Theora inflated the file from 10 MB to 50 MB; this
is unacceptable. Moreover, unpleasant visual artifacts appeared.
I was told it must be like that; you can get satisfactory compression
results
Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 12:47 +0200 schrieb Křištof Želechovski:
I suspect Google cannot convert most of the
video it already serves even if they wanted to.
I suspect Google, with its enourmous storage capacity, has the original
files of each and every video ever uploaded. But only Youtube
Regarding your example:
cite class=bibliography-item
Smith, John. iThe Triumph of HTML 5/i. 2015.
New York: Faraway Press. /cite
I think we can agree that one could use such a syntax outside of running
text, as in appendices, footnotes and the like. There is no much harm
People are reluctant to learn new tools and new ways. Most of the time it
is a sane protection from overwhelming abundance. It is not limited to
programming languages, it can affect also video encoders. It even affects
telephones (some people dislike telephones with keys).
Bjarne Stroustrup on
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Chris DiBonacdib...@gmail.com wrote:
Thinking out loud: One thing that was mentioned in an earlier post:
Vorbis. I am also of the mind that Vorbis is of higher quality/mb/sec
and statically than is mp3. The only real problem is that people don't
pirate with it,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Silvia
Pfeiffersilviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Chris DiBonacdib...@gmail.com wrote:
..
I'm not even sure that writing it into the standard would make vendors
actually support it, for the reasons above. If everyone had only the
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
Every codec has the same problem;
Every codec has the same problem if you can't prove a negative. That
turns out to be hard.
--
Robert Sayre
I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
Shift_JIS Windows-31J
[...]
Shift-JIS Windows-932
Le 5 juin 09, Anne van Kesteren écrivit :
Is the implication here that Shift_JIS and Shift-JIS are distinct
[...]?
No, Shift-JIS and Windows-932 are commonly used names/labels for the
Le 3 juin 09 à 23:53, Ian Hickson a écrit :
Since HTML5 supports MathML natively now, it seems that MathML is the
solution to use [for vulgar fractions].
There does not seem to be any real support for vulgar fractions in
MathML (neither as specified nor as currently implemented). I agree
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Manu Sporny wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
The scenarios described above fall into three categories: searching
for content, publishing content, and obtaining legal advice.
Ian, these use cases and your responses to them need to be put up on a
wiki somewhere - not many
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote:
I don't think the spec is clear enough defining these two elements from
an author's perspective.
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
element, and
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Samuel Santos wrote:
I was asked by a client if it was possible to implement something
similar to the asynchronous file upload used on gmail using only
standard web technologies.
Looking at the gmail source code I can see that they use some flash
magic. And by
13 matches
Mail list logo
