Re: [whatwg] api for fullscreen()

2010-01-31 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:43:49 +0100, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote: On Jan 30, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: To stop polluting the Window object, might it make sense to put the new members (other than event handler attributes) on window.screen? This would require that the

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol

2010-01-31 Thread NARUSE, Yui
(2010/01/31 2:05), Julian Reschke wrote: Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, WeBMartians wrote: Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII. There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters (less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII specifications. The

Re: [whatwg] api for fullscreen() - security issues

2010-01-31 Thread Olli Pettay
On 1/31/10 6:38 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: This one seems kind of weird. Does the spec currently distinguish significantly between a user-initiated click and a script-initiated one? DOM 3 Events draft does have the concept of trusted events; UA/user generated events are trusted, script

Re: [whatwg] Web-sockets + Web-workers to produce a P2P website or application

2010-01-31 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Andrew de Andrade wrote: [...] One of the big problems with these games is the shear amount of static content that must be delivered via HTTP once the application becomes popular. In fact, if a game becomes popular overnight, the scaling problems with this static