Am 31.08.2011 um 23:32 schrieb Karl Dubost:
Anselm,
(setting reply-to on www-style)
Seen this today, to remind people that it is not just
something up in the air. People need it.
http://www.webmonkey.com/2011/08/speed-up-your-responsive-designs-with-adaptive-images/
I wonder if it
Am 01.09.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Charles Pritchard:
On 8/31/2011 2:32 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Oh, that's not my proposal, that syntax was brought up by Tab Atkins.
It's already available. I was looking into how to handle img [no source]
style=background: url(..) /
It may work with the
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:18:26 +0200, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org
wrote:
After thinking more about this we believe that moving contains to Node
is a better alternative. The problem with Node inDocument is that it
does not say which document it is in so code would need to also check
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:48:36 +0200, David Geary
david.mark.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
A native Path object is on the list of features to be added to canvas in
due course.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
There's too much good stuff going on, both in the specs, and in my own
project. :-) I noticed Ehsan's blog post about editing on the Web,
http://ehsanakhgari.org/blog/2011-08-31/future-editing-web . I'm groaning
because I haven't been involved! :-p
A few thoughts on my mind:
1. I think we
On 9/1/2011 1:30 AM, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Charles Pritchard:
On 8/31/2011 2:32 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Oh, that's not my proposal, that syntax was brought up by Tab Atkins.
It's already available. I was looking into how to handle img
--
*Christopher Regan*
christ...@gmail.com* *(best)
(949) 600-0364 (cell)
(949) 484-9667 *Google Voice*
http://gplus.to/chrisregan *(Google+)* * *
http://wiki.webfoundation.org/Christopher_Regan *(Web Foundation)* *
*
http://www.indeed.com/r/ec81cfd49730a2fb *(Resume 03.11)*
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Alex Vincent ajvinc...@gmail.com wrote:
3. I just spotted a flaw in our API's. Imagine the following:
-
myEditor.undoManager.transact({apply: function () {
insert(document.createTextNode('o')) }, label: 'First transaction'});
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Alex Vincent ajvinc...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I think we should start writing a test suite, for two reasons.
First,
to get some idea how this works in practice, with a reference
--
*Christopher Regan*
christ...@gmail.com* *(best)
(949) 600-0364 (cell)
(949) 484-9667 *Google Voice*
http://gplus.to/chrisregan *(Google+)* * *
http://wiki.webfoundation.org/Christopher_Regan *(Web Foundation)* *
*
http://www.indeed.com/r/ec81cfd49730a2fb *(Resume 03.11)*
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alex Vincent ajvinc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Implementing it in JavaScript will be somewhat challenging because
managed/automatic transactions need to keep track of all changes made by a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Will the methods above adequately handle this?
I believe from Gmail's perspective, yes.
Notifications shouldn't require any clicks at all. They should just work,
initially constrained to the browser page, with an
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:18:26 +0200, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org
wrote:
After thinking more about this we believe that moving contains to Node
is a better alternative. The problem with Node inDocument is that it
13 matches
Mail list logo
