On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
If the weird values are just for compatibility, then I think it would be
better to change the spec to drop the ones no one implements. I certainly
would not want the list of versioned types to expand over time with new
Hi whatwg,
I've added a proposal to the wiki
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/AllowSeamless about letting a document
indicate that it is willing to be displayed seamlessly with a
cross-origin parent. This proposal is a refinement of the approach
previously discussed in this thread:
Hi, folks. I'm stubbing out a quick dirty implementation of UndoManager
in JavaScript, and I have a few questions.
For those not familiar, the spec lives here:
http://rniwa.com/editing/undomanager.html
* The spec is inconsistent in a few places. For instance, in the green
non-normative
On May 26, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
Hi whatwg,
I've added a proposal to the wiki
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/AllowSeamless about letting a document
indicate that it is willing to be displayed seamlessly with a
cross-origin parent. This proposal is a
