On 2017-04-10 David Kendal wrote:
> On 2017-04-09 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > On 2017-04-09 David Kendal wrote:
> >
> > > ... there are many possible uses for local static files accessing
> > > other local static files: the one I have in mind is shipping static
> > > files on CD-ROM or USB stick...
>
On 9 April 2017 at 11:51, David Kendal wrote:
> Moin,
>
> Over the last few years there has been a gradual downgrading of support
> in browsers for running pages from the file: protocol. Most browsers now
> have restrictions on the ability of JavaScript in such pages to access
>
On 9 Apr 2017, at 20:36, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> On 2017-04-09 David Kendal wrote:
>
> > ... there are many possible uses for local static files accessing
> > other local static files: the one I have in mind is shipping static
> > files on CD-ROM or USB stick...
>
> In
On 9 Apr 2017, at 14:48, Philipp Serafin wrote:
> Note also that the HTTP server solution requires you to ship a binary
> (the server) with your files, therefore sacrificing platform
> independence and requiring the user to run an untrusted binary, all
> just to show some HTML