Maybe a solution then would be to provide a way to request more storage
space?
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Roger Hågensen
> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-04-19 11:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Roger Hågensen
wrote:
> On 2017-04-19 11:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> I already pointed to https://wicg.github.io/entries-api/ as a way to
>> get access to a directory of files and as a way to
>> get access to a sequence of files.
On 2017-04-19 11:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I already pointed to https://wicg.github.io/entries-api/ as a way to
get access to a directory of files and as a way to
get access to a sequence of files. Both for read access. I haven't
seen any interest to go beyond that.
Is this the Filesystem
在 2017年04月19日 17:28, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:08 AM, duanyao wrote:
This is really not intended. I just don't quite understand some of those
points. For example,
Is "the web being fundamentally linked to HTTP" just the current status of
the industry,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:08 AM, duanyao wrote:
> This is really not intended. I just don't quite understand some of those
> points. For example,
> Is "the web being fundamentally linked to HTTP" just the current status of
> the industry, or
> the inherent philosiphy of the
在 2017年04月19日 16:09, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:45 AM, duanyao wrote:
These have been a lot of discussion on that in this thread. Do you think
writing a more formal document would be helpful?
Perhaps. Fundamentally, I don't think you've made a
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:45 AM, duanyao wrote:
> These have been a lot of discussion on that in this thread. Do you think
> writing a more formal document would be helpful?
Perhaps. Fundamentally, I don't think you've made a compelling enough
case for folks to become