Re: [whatwg] rel=bookmark

That use case sounds more like rel="canonical" On 6 Aug 2017 2:07 am, "Ed Summers" wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can provide any information, or a pointer to > previous discussion, about why the bookmark link relation can't be used > with the element [1]. > >

Re: [whatwg] rel=bookmark

Hi Ed, (Remember to use the HTML Standard, located at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#link-type-bookmark, not any forks of it.) Right now the bookmark link relation has a specific purpose, as you can read in the spec: > The bookmark keyword gives a permalink for the nearest

[whatwg] rel=bookmark

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone can provide any information, or a pointer to previous discussion, about why the bookmark link relation can't be used with the element [1]. The topic has come up recently on the IETF link-relations discussion list [2] where a new link relation has been