Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Honza Bambas wrote:
Hi, I would like to ask for clarification of opportunistic caching spec
in Offline Web Applications, the article 4.9.1.9. Adding a resource whom
URI matches an opportunistic name space seems to be done only for top
level documents
Ian Hickson wrote:
Many years ago I wrote a draft for how to do full-duplex communication
from a Web page. Over the years we've received much feedback on this
TCPConnection API. I've now completely rewritten the relevant section and
given it a new name, Web Sockets:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Honza Bambas wrote:
Hi, I would like to ask for clarification of opportunistic caching spec
in Offline Web Applications, the article 4.9.1.9. Adding a resource whom
URI matches an opportunistic name space seems to be done only for top
level documents
the browser is in offline
mode (including user switch to offline mode manually) the only
reasonable event seems to be onerror call because the server could not
actually be reached. The spec says nothing in particular about behavior
of the update process while browser is offline.
Thanks
Honza Bambas
The spec says when an iframe (a child browsing context) doesn't refer a
manifest in the html tag it has to inherit cache from its parent's
document.
1. This should be restricted to the same origin because when an offline
application loads in an iframe a site (an advertisement or what ever
In the W3C spec for localStorage
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#the-localstorage-attribute is said
to present it (the persistent storage) the same way as cookies.
There were suggestion to throw DOM_QUOTA_ERROR exception when storing to
localStorage in case when cookies are in a
See also mozilla bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494799
Effective script origin driven by document.domain is used to allow
sharing of properties and data among pages coming from different
subdomains. Should this data sharing apply also to sessionStorage and
localStorage? It
, use (click) that bookmark.
So, there are tendencies and voices to open web content in a sidebar in
all browsers but it is not taken as a standard. I would really like this
feature to be available in all browsers.
Opinions?
Honza Bambas
The spec says:
When the |setItem()
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-setitem|,
|removeItem()
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-removeitem|, and
|clear() http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-clear|
methods are called on a |Storage
Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Honza Bambas hon...@allpeers.com wrote:
The spec says:
When the setItem(), removeItem(), and clear() methods are called on a
Storage object x that is associated with a session storage area, if the
methods did something, then in every
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Honza Bambas wrote:
The spec says:
When the |setItem()
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-setitem|, |removeItem()
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-removeitem|, and |clear()
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage
11 matches
Mail list logo
