in reverse, in my testing.
Firefox, Chrome and Safari on desktop and mobile don’t support negative values
at all AFAICT. I have notes here suggesting that mobile platforms don’t even
support positive rates other that 1. --
James Ross ja...@james-ross.co.uk
are intended to cover this.
--
James Ross ja...@james-ross.co.uk
or
control-a) removes it.
I would be interested in why this behaviour was not adopted in IE10's
input[placeholder] implementation.
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
in all three in the cases I've tried just now.
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
the field gets focus
IE 10 hides it when the field gets focus.
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
and make no mention of the page/URL containing the link. Chrome 25
doesn't show the host at all in the primary UI but the Downloads window
includes the full URL of the file, and nothing about the page containing the
link.
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
,
communications).
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
, IE10 gives
pathname/search as test/?test in both IE10 and IE9 modes.
--
James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:07 PM, James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk
wrote:
FWIW, according to http://dump.testsuite.org/url/inspect.html, IE10 gives
pathname/search as test/?test in both IE10 and IE9 modes.
Sweet, is that true for test:test?test, about:blank?test, and
data:test
From: o...@chromium.org
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:45:07 -0700
I didn't test nested scrollbars in Windows. I believe Elliott may have. I
did test them on Mac and Ubuntu. Clicking on nested scrollbars doesn't move
focus even if the scrollable element is focusable. On Ubuntu, clicking on
10 matches
Mail list logo
