On 2010-03-17 17:28, Jonas Sicking wrote:
/ I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
// it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
//
// data- is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later
// someone will start basing microformats-like markup on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:03:33 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote:
I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
data- is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or
Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
2010/3/17 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used
quite a
lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with
this.
Anyone else have an opinion on this?
I don't feel strongly that
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
2010/3/17 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used
quite a
lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with
this.
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote:
I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
data- is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later
someone will start basing microformats-like markup on that.
2010/3/17 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Kornel LesiÅ~Dski wrote:
I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
data- is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later
someone will start basing
I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make it
clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
data- is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later someone
will start basing microformats-like markup on that.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
