于 2014/8/14 21:23, Nils Dagsson Moskopp 写道:
duanyao duan...@ustc.edu writes:
On 07/28/2014 22:08, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my
duanyao duan...@ustc.edu writes:
On 07/28/2014 22:08, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao
于 2014年07月31日 02:02, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM, 段垚 duan...@ustc.edu wrote:
于 2014/7/29 18:48, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
There's an enormous amount of tricky things to define around file
URLs, this being one of them.
Are there some resources on those tricky things?
No,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM, 段垚 duan...@ustc.edu wrote:
于 2014/7/29 18:48, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
There's an enormous amount of tricky things to define around file
URLs, this being one of them.
Are there some resources on those tricky things?
No, not really. But it's a short list:
1)
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, duanyao duan...@ustc.edu wrote:
I think rule 5.1 should be applied to both static fetching and XHR
consistently. Browsers should set Content-Type header to local files' actual
type for XHR, and interpret
them accordingly. But firefox developers think this
于 2014/7/29 18:48, Anne van Kesteren 写道:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, duanyao duan...@ustc.edu wrote:
I think rule 5.1 should be applied to both static fetching and XHR
consistently. Browsers should set Content-Type header to local files' actual
type for XHR, and interpret
them
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
(http://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org):
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
On 07/28/2014 22:08, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the cracks
in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
(http://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org):
5.1 Interpreting the resource metadata
...
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
(http://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org):
5.1 Interpreting the resource metadata
...
If the resource is retrieved directly from the file system, set
supplied-type to the MIME type
provided by the file system.
As far
11 matches
Mail list logo
