On 2015-03-31 23:17, Felix Miata wrote:
Roger Hågensen composed on 2015-03-31 21:09 (UTC+0200):
... For Mozilla browsers, you
can go to about:config and set media.autoplay.enabled to “false�. Also,
the NoScript browser extension can make media click-to-play by default.
I hardly think a
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:47:26PM -0700, Seth Fowler wrote:
I think we should modify the Page Visibility spec to let UA’s take
actual visibility of iframes into account when deciding if an iframe
is hidden.
Right now, the visibility of an iframe is the same as that of the top
level browsing
On Apr 1, 2015, at 10:35 PM, David Young dyo...@pobox.com wrote:
I cannot take for granted
the good will of the web developer, and even developers with good
intentions may make a mistake or cut corners.
Trust me, you’re preaching to the choir on that!
It seems to me that the UA should
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Seth Fowler s...@mozilla.com wrote:
I think we should modify the Page Visibility spec to let UA’s take actual
visibility of iframes into account when deciding if an iframe is hidden.
Wouldn't it be better to discuss that on public-web-perf?
--
Looking at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/HTML/Element/iframe
Wouldn't maybe the addition of new attribute to the iframe be the best way?
**
autopause
If present the client can pause any processing related to the
iframe if the iframe is not currently
autopause looks promising, but I want to ask for more: also add an
autounload attribute to allow UAs to unload specific iframes when they
are invisible.
I ask for this because I'm a contributor of pdf2htmlEX (
https://github.com/coolwanglu/pdf2htmlEX ).
Currently pdf2htmlEX can convert each
On 2015-03-31 10:16, duanyao wrote:
autopause looks promising, but I want to ask for more: also add an
autounload attribute to allow UAs to unload specific iframes when
they are invisible.
This is also a good idea.
I also realized that maybe video and audio can benefit from a
autopause
On 2015-03-31 16:09, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 3/31/15 2:18 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
What type of iframes would benefit from this?
Ads, from a user point of view.
Now getting them to opt in to being throttled...
-Boris
Would not a ad delivery network prefer not to have to push ads out
On 2015-03-31 20:55, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
Roger Hågensen rh_wha...@skuldwyrm.no writes:
I often open multiple tabs, and then I go through them one by one later.
If I end up opening 3-4 videos at the same time I have to stop the other
3 so I do not get a cacophony of 4 videos at once.
Roger Hågensen rh_wha...@skuldwyrm.no writes:
I often open multiple tabs, and then I go through them one by one later.
If I end up opening 3-4 videos at the same time I have to stop the other
3 so I do not get a cacophony of 4 videos at once.
This is something that can be fixed by the UA:
On Mar 31, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Roger Hågensen rh_wha...@skuldwyrm.no wrote:
Would not a ad delivery network prefer not to have to push ads out that the
user is not seeing at all?
If not then they are only wasting bandwidth/CPU/memory on the server, and
causing impressions that are wasted
Roger Hågensen composed on 2015-03-31 21:09 (UTC+0200):
... For Mozilla browsers, you
can go to about:config and set media.autoplay.enabled to âfalseâ. Also,
the NoScript browser extension can make media click-to-play by default.
I hardly think a lot of users want to follow directions
I think we should modify the Page Visibility spec to let UA’s take actual
visibility of iframes into account when deciding if an iframe is hidden.
Right now, the visibility of an iframe is the same as that of the top level
browsing context it’s embedded in. Here are the details:
A coworker pointed me to this thread on public-web-perf where exactly this
proposal has been made before:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2014Jan/0047.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2014Jan/0047.html
Reading through the posts there has given me
14 matches
Mail list logo
