On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Advantages of putting this in JS over multipart:
- it's backwards-compatible
- it's easier to parse a static barrier than a multipart/*'s wacky
syntax.
- it doesn't
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Yeah, but the multipart logic has pretty big disadvantages -- mainly the
opposite of the advantages for a built-in feature:
- not backwards compatible
- not as simple to understand, use, implement, or spec
- doesn't really
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Adam Barth wrote:
Why not just introduce a keyword or pragma to JavaScript that tells
the user agent to act as if the end of the Program production had been
reached, and that it should treat the remainder
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Adam Barth wrote:
Working through some examples, that seems really strange:
foo();
breakParsing();
bar();
In this case, breakParsing() works a bit like yield() in other
programming languages: first foo() executes, then the event loop
spins, then bar() executes.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Adam Barth wrote:
Currently, there are a number of ways to load a script from the network
and execute it, but none of them will actually load and execute the
script as fast as physically possible. Consider
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Adam Barth wrote:
Why not just introduce a keyword or pragma to JavaScript that tells
the user agent to act as if the end of the Program production had been
reached, and that it should treat the remainder of the file as another
Program?
This could even be done
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
This could even be done in a backwards-compatible fashion by having the
syntax to do this be something that down-level clients ignore, e.g.:
/*@BREAK*/
...or some such.
That approach is an in-band signal,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Steve Souders wha...@souders.org wrote:
Defer doesn't achieve the desired behavior. The goal is load this
script after everything else in the page is done. Instead, defer'ed scripts
get loaded immediately, thus stealing one of the few network connections
from
Six out of the six mentioned sites are never visited by me.
Though I know I am not representative in these numbers, I believe I recently
saw tests about defer currently having different implementation across
browser and different behavior depending on the script insertion point and
again
Defer doesn't achieve the desired behavior. The goal is load this
script after everything else in the page is done. Instead, defer'ed
scripts get loaded immediately, thus stealing one of the few network
connections from other (more important) resources.
Here's an example:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Steve Souders wrote:
Given that it is possible to do this from script, how common is it for
people to do it from script? If it's very common, that would be a good
data point encouraging us to do this sooner rather than later.
6 of the top 10 US web sites load
Given that it is possible to do this from script, how common is it for
people to do it from script? If it's very common, that would be a good
data point encouraging us to do this sooner rather than later.
6 of the top 10 US web sites load scripts after the load event: eBay,
Facebook, Bing,
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Brian Kuhn wrote:
In section
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-script-async, it
says:
*Fetching an external script must delay the load event of the element's
document until the task that is queued by the networking task source
once the
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Here is the list of elements that we *don't* execute scripts inside of
in firefox:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/base/src/nsScriptElement.cpp#148
i.e. iframe, noframes, noembed
Everywhere else we do execute the script.
On , Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Martin Atkins wrote:
Could browsers handle confirm() and friends in such a way that they only
block the contents of the tab, not the whole browser? In particular, the
close tab and close window features, ideally along with things
15 matches
Mail list logo
