Re: [whatwg] Input type=date UI discussion

2005-07-13 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Brian Wilson wrote: Some possible user interface realizations (draft) of the date widget: Input type=date popup: http://people.opera.com/brian/testfiles/input-date-popup.png I'd reverse the month and year input elements. - Year numbers, Month labels and day numbers should be localized

Re: [whatwg] Suggestion: Mouse Wheel events for Web Apps 1.0

2005-06-21 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Erik Arvidsson wrote: Chris Griego wrote: Currently the only way to capture and use the mouse wheel on the web is within the Macromedia Flash v7 plugin which added event handling for the mouse wheel. That's incorrect. Both IE (since 5.5?) and Mozilla supports this. Unfortunately they do it

Re: [whatwg] [html5] datetime attribute

2005-06-17 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Jonathan Leighton wrote: the datetime attribute. The HTML4 specification says[2] that If a generating application does not know the time to the second, it may use the value 00 for the seconds (and minutes and hours if necessary). But how can one define the exact time 00 if it cannot be

Re: [whatwg] A thought: a href=... method=post

2005-05-13 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
James Graham wrote: Kornel Lesinski wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:28:25 +0100, Mark Wubben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a href=/delete/$id/confirm action=/delete/$id method=postdelete/a That it doesn't look like data to send using POST method. I'm afraid that in most cases it will be used as: a

Re: [whatwg] [wf2] Note about XML attribute value handling

2005-05-10 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Could we perhaps make a note about this in the WF2 specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#AVNormalize Preferably somewhere close to input type=hidden. My weblog used to run on XHTML and previewed weblog comments where stored inside the VALUE attribute of a

Re: [whatwg] [html5] DI element

2005-03-10 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Rob Mientjes wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:58:33 +0100, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The advantage of DI is that it allows grouping of definitions and Well, I'm not sure if it's not already clear that, without a definition term, there can be no new definition descriptions. It is on