On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 8/25/10 9:37 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > Note that this issue means that using atob or btoa for dealing with
> > this is a huge pain if non-ASCII chars are involved, since those take
> > and return byte arrays masquerading as JS strings, not actual
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:47:26 +0100, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, David Flanagan wrote:
The structured clone algorithm currently allows ImageData and Blob
objects to be cloned but doesn't mention ArrayBuffer. Is this
intentio
chkrrchn...@aol.com,recghongr...@yahoo.com,rechongr...@hotmail.com,rechonyiaonakagr...@googlegroups.com,rech...@ovi.com
--
R.C.O
Thanks, you save my life!!
Btw i'd reli like the onpopstate to fire as early as possible, possibly
before images are requested/dom is fully loaded. But this is already great
enough :D
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Henry Chan
> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> > On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
> > > > the diagnostic
On 2/1/11 11:47 AM, Adam de Boor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
the
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageData) as
discussed in this thread?:
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029885.html
For what it's
Problem Statement:
Loading JavaScript onto a page poses several performance issues. With a regular
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageData) as
discussed in this thread?:
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>> While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
>>> keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageDat
?> The ability to separate download and execution is a trend that has not
only emerged, but continues to be explored. There are problems with the
previous solutions, the biggest of which (in the case of #1 and #2) is the
reliance on the browser caching behavior which may, in some instances, lead
I almost completely agree with you. The major issue I have with the way the
spec is written is that there is no way to feature detect this capability. I'd
like this behavior (which I agree, is useful), to be more explicit so we can
easily make use where available.
-Nicholas
__
No comments so far on this issue so I'll describe it a bit more.
Consequences of the current text are that resource fetches are
canceled for a document when navigating away from it, even if
the user then chooses to cancel the navigation at a
"beforeunload" prompt and returns to the document.
Best
?> The major issue I have with the way the spec is written is that there is
no way to feature detect this capability. I'd like this behavior (which I
agree, is useful), to be more explicit so we can easily make use where
available.
I agree, the spec doesn't make it clear in its current wording
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>
>> On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>>
>>> While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
>>> keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do yo
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 00:47, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> >>
> >> When evaluating a parser-inserted script, there are three potential
> >> script global objects to use:
> >>
> >> 1) The script global object of the docume
On 2/1/11 1:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
For what it's worth, in Gecko that's the same thing, since imagedata
is just a typed array in our implementation.
ImageData.data you mean?
Yes.
I wonder if we can still remove CanvasPixelA
18 matches
Mail list logo
