Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread David Singer
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 4:03 , Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Marks wrote: > >> QuickTime supports full variable speed playback and has done for well over >> a decade. With bidirectionally predicted frames you need a

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Kevin Marks
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:55 AM, David Singer wrote: > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:47 , Yay295 wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:30 AM, David Singer wrote: > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 4:03 , Robert O'Callahan >

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Kevin Marks
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:57 AM, David Singer wrote: > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:36 , Kevin Marks wrote: > > > I suppose the browser could generate this data the first time it reads > through the video. It would use a lot less memory. Though that sounds

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread David Singer
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:36 , Kevin Marks wrote: > > I suppose the browser could generate this data the first time it reads > > through the video. It would use a lot less memory. Though that sounds like > > a problem for the browsers to solve, not the standard. > > There

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Yay295
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:30 AM, David Singer wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 4:03 , Robert O'Callahan > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Marks > wrote: > >> QuickTime supports full variable speed playback and has

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread David Singer
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:47 , Yay295 wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:30 AM, David Singer wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 4:03 , Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Marks wrote: >

Re: [whatwg] deprecating

2015-09-01 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: > > As the WhatWG only recenly moved to Github members here may not have > noticed that has been deprecated. > > I opened https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/67 to give space for the > discussion. It is a pitty that this was closed so

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:30 AM, David Singer wrote: > On Sep 1, 2015, at 4:03 , Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > How about a hard but realistic (IMHO) case: 4K video (4096 x 2160), 25 > fps, > > keyframe every 10s. Storing all those frames takes 250 x 4096 x

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Kevin Marks
QuickTime supports full variable speed playback and has done for well over a decade. With bidirectionally predicted frames you need a fair few buffers anyway, so generalising to full variable wait is easier than posters above claim - you need to work a GOP at a time, but memory buffering isn't the

[whatwg] deprecating

2015-09-01 Thread henry.st...@bblfish.net
As the WhatWG only recenly moved to Github members here may not have noticed that has been deprecated. I opened https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/67 to give space for the discussion. It is a pitty that this was closed so quickly ( within an hour ) without giving members and the public (

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > From: Eric Carlson [mailto:eric.carl...@apple.com] > >> FWIW, Safari supports negative playback rates on the desktop and on iOS. >> >> ... >> >> The crash Garrett noted in Safari 8 is a bug that “only" happens with

Re: [whatwg] VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

2015-09-01 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Marks wrote: > QuickTime supports full variable speed playback and has done for well over > a decade. With bidirectionally predicted frames you need a fair few buffers > anyway, so generalising to full variable wait is easier than