Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Delfi Ramirez
Garrett et al: I really appreciate your delicate sense of humour. Not sure if all the people in the list does the same. We all know a computer-- opossite to we human beings - is unable to interpret correctly, unconciently, the information pheromones and smells have. I am speaking now like

[whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Garrett Smith
There has been good progress in HTML5 for and . But the tag has been missing — why? Well no longer, now thanks to a new game-changing proposal: But it occurred to me: This could be huge paradigm shift in towards Internet Odorous Things. boolean `navigator.isSmellEnabled` Thank you, --

Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Garrett Smith
Just a lighthearted April Fools, and that's it. Sorry if it made anyone upset. Sent from my bathroom Attachment: poo.sm > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Delfi Ramirez wrote: > > Garrett et al: > > I really appreciate your delicate sense of humour. Not sure if all the

Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Daniel Murphy
We need the detection api because we wouldn't want to waste our expensive smell synthesis technology on the likes of webcrawlers and other robots who wouldn't benefit. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM Daniel Murphy wrote: > Don't forget, we also need: > > *SmellEvent* > >

Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Daniel Murphy
Don't forget, we also need: *SmellEvent* - "onsmellchanged" - "onsmellstart" - "onsmellend" - "ongoodsmell" - "onbadsmell" And the new detection api: window.doesUserHaveNose() : Promise On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:14 AM Delfi Ramirez wrote: > Garrett et

Re: [whatwg] We need more colors in CSS

2016-04-01 Thread Delfi Ramirez
Not really, Alex. We have more colours now through _SYNAESTHESIA_, thanks to the tag ;) --- Delfi Ramirez My digital signature [1] +34 633 589231 del...@segonquart.net [2] twitter: delfinramirez IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart [3] http://segonquart.net http://delfiramirez.info [4]

Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 2 avr. 2016 à 04:04, Daniel Murphy a écrit : > we wouldn't want to waste our expensive > smell synthesis technology on the likes of webcrawlers and other robots who > wouldn't benefit. Yup. User agent sniffing definitely stinks. -- Karl Dubost 

Re: [whatwg] New tag

2016-04-01 Thread Brian Kardell
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 2 avr. 2016 à 04:04, Daniel Murphy a écrit : > > we wouldn't want to waste our expensive > > smell synthesis technology on the likes of webcrawlers and other robots > who > > wouldn't benefit. > > >