with these licenses
Chris DiBona
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, jjcogliati-wha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you for a very informative reply. Inline comments follow.
--- On Sun, 5/31/09, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] MPEG-1 subset
Looping in Dannyb (who may not be on the list, so if necessary, I'll
forward) as I'm in the midst of a conference and can't give this the
attention it deserves.
Chris
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Håkon Wium Lie howc...@opera.com wrote:
Also sprach Chris DiBona:
To be clear, there are two
Looping in Danny (in transit)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon
foolist...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2 Jun 2009, at 02:58, Chris DiBona wrote:
One participant quoted one of the examples from the LGPL 2.1, which
says For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free
Yeah, this is really pretty difficult stuff. The lgpl is probably the
least understood and most complicated free software licenses.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Berlin dan...@google.com wrote:
On
I mostly wanted to explain our position on the use of the library and
the LGPLs. Danny keeps it all straight for us.
Happy hacking, everyone!
Chris
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:34:08 +0200, Chris DiBona cdib...@gmail.com wrote
At this point I feel like we're giving open source advice to teams
outside of Google, which is beyond our mission. We're comfortable with
our compliance mission and feel it is accurate and correct. Other
companies and people need to make their own decisions about
compliance.
Chris
On Sun, Jun 7,
To me, it seems more like Google doesn't really want to take a position in
the matter regarding codecs and is taking the weird way out by using
ffmpeg. Given Google's dominance in search, which tends to bring people to
at least look at Google's products, anything Google does is examined with a
The incredibly sucky outcome is that Chrome ships patent-encumbered
open web features, just like Apple. That is reprehensible.
Reprehensible? Mozilla (and all the rest) supports those same open
web features through its plugin architecture. Why don't you make a
stand and shut down compatibility
, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Nils Dagsson
Moskoppnils-dagsson-mosk...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote:
Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 09:24 +0900 schrieb Chris DiBona:
The incredibly sucky outcome is that Chrome ships patent-encumbered
open web features, just like Apple. That is reprehensible.
Reprehensible
, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Robert O'Callahanrob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm perfectly calm, what people need to realize is that this issue is
actually not about submarined patents (more like aircraft carrier
patents) or tricky corner
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Mike Shavermike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the poor threading, I wasn't subscribed when the message
here was sent.
In http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020237.html
Chris DiBona wrote:
The incredibly sucky outcome
We certainly believe so, but I'm certainly not qualified to evaluate
the different techniques.
Would Theora inherently be any less able to than any other codec
system, though? I hope you're not saying that it has to be H.264
forever, given the spectre of the streaming license changes at the
Let me ask David Sparks and see where it went, I remember we had it in
the inital drops, or thought we did.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mike Shavermike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Chris DiBonacdib...@gmail.com wrote:
actually shipping with Theora (also on
It'll take a little while, I'm travelling a bit this month (brazil ,
new york, etc..)
Chris
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Håkon Wium Liehowc...@opera.com wrote:
Also sprach Chris DiBona:
I don't think the bandwidth delta is very much with recent (and
format-compatible) improvements
Hi greg;
I'll pass this on, it's a good post. Have you considered other kinds
of video tests as well? (something cell shaded, more movement/action,
etc...) as it stands, it's useful, with more examples, it might be
more convincing as an argument for Theora.
Chris
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:15
15 matches
Mail list logo
