this?
Thanks,
Jerason Banes
On 6/1/07, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Yeah, this is mentioned in the security section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#security5
...along with recommended solutions to mitigate it.
All of those mitigation measures seem to be
You may know this already, but the on* handlers have been deprecated and
replaced with the DOM 2 Events* standard. So instead of doing 'onclick =
DoFunction()' the programmer should be calling
element.addEventListener('click',
DoFunction, false). If I understand you correctly, this effectively
I believe an aim of whatwg is a viable implementable standard that
reflects the realities of the web while encouraging innovation. MPEG4
is part of the web (a growing part too).
If I may, I'd like to echo Timeless's point here. I've been watching this
thread with great interest and believe I
to.
See ya
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/
All the Vlogging News on One Page
http://vlograzor.com/
On 6/26/07, Jerason Banes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe an aim of whatwg is a viable implementable standard
On 6/26/07, Maik Merten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opera and Mozilla already have implemented (early) Ogg Vorbis and Ogg
Theora support.
And (if this thread is any indication) are likely to be the only ones.
Internet Explorer still holds the majority of the market, and Safari is
still the
. Especially
if a few major web browsers ship Theora support long enough to assuage fears
over its unknown patent status.
Thanks,
Jerason Banes
On Dec 12, 2007 6:00 AM, Sanghyeon Seo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I read, it is argued, that pre-existing use by large
companies is a good
, the MPEG
LA will litigate the matter and/or come to an agreement with the patent
holder to license the patent on behalf of their member companies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264#Patent_licensing
Thanks,
Jerason Banes
On Dec 12, 2007 7:15 AM, Joseph Daniel Zukiger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
/Theora?* While I understand that there is no actual patents to
license at this time, a fee to MPEG-LA (enough to cover possible patents in
the future + MPEG-LA's standard profit margin) for protection against
submarine patents could very well solve this impasse.
Any thoughts?
Jerason Banes
On Dec
Long story short, accesskeys were an idea that worked better on paper than
they did in practice. They inevitably interfered with normal browser
operation as well as other accessibility features in such a way as to *
reduce* the accessibility of many web pages.
The intended replacement is the
To add to what Christoph is saying, perhaps there's a better way to look at
this problem? A reverse list has both a start and an end, just like any
other list. The key is that it's displayed in the opposite order of a
regular list.
This raises the question, why does the list need to be
they be high quality. If I'm playing a video game, the quality
simply does not matter as much.
I hope you will all keep we poor device users in mind when you come to your
decision.
Thanks!
Jerason Banes
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Oliver Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither of these apply
I think this is an excellent point. I've been playing with the Chroma-Key
replacement trick demonstrated in FireFox 3.1b3:
https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Manipulating_video_using_canvas
For my own experiments, I grabbed a
13 matches
Mail list logo
