Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

I think I got it straightened out.  The type scripts handle the batch file formats, being .frm/.fld/.mnu/.smn, for multi-source appliance.    The subtype scripts handle the attributes with respect to types.  The 'link' type script redirects link paths to the user agent.  So CML script updates

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

I find it somewhat strange that we are not able to synch up on this proposal.   It's kind of funny, but there isn't much to these new tags I mentioned.   They're used like any regular html tags, like , for example, but .  So the source tag would retrieve the action_page.php file by means of the

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

Roger,You wrote:How is this any different from PHP, ASP, JSP, .Net, ColdFusion, etc?  You could implement your CML on the backend and have it 'output' XML/HTML+JavaScript+CSS for delivery to user agents with compatibility with everything out there today. In response:I've tried a little bit of

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On 2016-10-06 14:15, MegaZone wrote: How is this any different from PHP, ASP, JSP, .Net, ColdFusion, etc? You could implement your CML on the backend and have it 'output' XML/HTML+JavaScript+CSS for delivery to user agents with compatibility with everything out there today. ... There are many

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On 2016-10-06 03:45, Jacob Villarreal wrote: > Hi,Thanks for responding. I don't think you have the right picture I'm pretty sure I don't have the right picture (or at least your picture). > I was actually proposing a new markup language referred to as content markup language. The hypertext

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On 2016-10-06 04:42, Jacob Villarreal wrote: Roger, I thought I should send you the pdf diagram anyway. I've attached it to this email. Hope it gets through to you. Jacob That was little more than a PDF with bullet points. It certainly was not a diagram, this is a (example) of a kind of

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On 2016-10-06 04:42, Jacob Villarreal wrote: Roger, I thought I should send you the pdf diagram anyway. I've attached it to this email. Hope it gets through to you. Jacob That was little more than a PDF with bullet points. It certainly was not a diagram, this is a (example) of a kind of

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Jacob Villarreal wrote: > Sorry, correction on the code above: > record:path/ticker_data.rec/+1>or, record:path/ticker_data.rec/29> > Thanks. > How is this any different from PHP, ASP, JSP, .Net, ColdFusion, etc? You could implement your CML

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

Sorry, correction on the code above: or, Thanks. On Thursday, October 6, 2016 4:56 AM, Jacob Villarreal wrote: Hey Roger,So what's the difference in retrieving an image file by means of html, from a database/folder, in contrast with retrieving an image file from a

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

Hey Roger,So what's the difference in retrieving an image file by means of html, from a database/folder, in contrast with retrieving an image file from a CML tag which calls it up from a database/folder?  What I thought might work, is structuring the mapping with one folder with all of it's

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

Hi,Thanks for responding.  I don't think you have the right picture as to what I was proposing.  I'll try to clear it up a bit.  I was actually proposing a new markup language referred to as content markup language.  The hypertext part of it isn't that important.  CML would has the linking

Re: [whatwg] Some Clarification on CML Proposal

On 2016-10-05 08:17, Jacob Villarreal wrote: > I was proposing a really simple markup language. I call it content markup language (CML). You do realize that HTML stands for Hyper Text Markup Language right? Adding a markup language to a markup language is illogical, it is better to improve