this difference ?
I will be very thankful to you
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120328/1ac238b1/attachment.htm
I doubt that a structure with 50 unique atoms is physically correct,
and by reducing the symmetry you are making your problem much, much
harder than it should be. Fe2O3 is a high-symmetry structure, and if
you have correctly used full precision when creating the structure
(i.e. 0. not
Assuming that from Analysis you mean experrimental data, and Plot
of Band Gap you mean what Wien2k is giving, the explanation is that
many DFT functionals underestimate experimental band gaps.
If this is not what you mean please explain in more detail and perhaps
someone can help.
2012/3/28
Dear Laurence Marks,
I am very thankful to you.
yeah definitely i already used it. actually i used Materials Studiowhich? is
software for simulating and modeling different stricture of
different materials. i generate my structure using material studio and
upload it on wien2k as cif file.
So
Dear Laurence Marks,
one thing is this that it is the surface thin film calculation not the bulk.
that's why it is not physically incorrect. i told you in last mail i used one
software for creating this structure and also untill scf cycle is converged.
but when i take into account LDA+U then
I am Working on a Binary compound . when I check its Band Gap value from
Analysis 0.526 eV but when I closely monitor the Plot Of Band Gap
visually there is no Gap between conduction and valence band i,e: it is
showing zero Band Gap Value.
What the reason behind this difference ?
Assuming
://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120328/08a27b5f/attachment.htm
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120328/02942b7a/attachment.htm
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20120328/fc6aa408/attachment.htm
The information is in what you sent, the line /usr/bin/ld: cannot
find -lgoto. Your compilation options include the goto library for
blas commands, but either you do not have this installed or you did
not include information on where it is. For instance, if the file was
in a directory
I sent an email about a broken link on the Goto page, and received the
following back. Maybe someone should store copies of the libraries
and/or try the alternatives. (It looks like what remains of Goto is
only for older computers.)
From: Robert van de Geijn r...@cs.utexas.edu
Thank you. Goto
Since from what you say you are not doing LDA+U or a hybrid, you do
not need the density matrices (dmat) so I believe this is not a
problem and you can ignore it.
If your message is Vec2old_LAPW command not found that is strange,
was it vec2old_LAPW command not found. Try doing which
/attachments/20120328/545f0f75/attachment.htm
Send to the Wien list
2012/3/28 arqum hashmi arqumhashmi at yahoo.com:
Dear Sir Laurence Marks,
thanks a lot for your time.
sir i send attached struct file to wien mailing address or to your email
address.? sir i am confused because if structure file has some problem then
how scf cycle
14 matches
Mail list logo