And yes, you should not add RLO (relativistic local orbitals) for optics
[ http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/limitations/ ].
NX number of atoms for which *RLO* is added <-
Should be obvious that this and the NX1 lines related to RLOs should be
deleted from
If you are editing case.inso by hand, for NX and NX1, the X needs
replaced by a number. Though, I would think that would want to use the
nice and easy to use interactive initso script in the terminal. [1]
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg10625.html
On
Dear Dr. Abo
Thank you for your instruction. I already have tried that post in the forum. It
also gave me the same error for "x lapwso -up".
About the inso file; Yes I do have case.inso in the working directory and it is
copied bellow. Please have a look on it and please tell me if something is
It has been awhile such that I don't remember, but I believe it was
recommended not to use runsp_lapw with "-s lapw1 -e lcore" anymore as
seen inthe post at [1] even though you still find a reference to it in
the WIEN2k 17.1 usersguide under the optic section "8.17.1 Execution" on
page 177
Please find enclosed the advertisment of a PhD position in G. Madsens
group at the TU Vienna.
Regards
--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX:
Did you check whether this is the only structurefile that does not work ?
You may try to run the optimize job in the reversed order with largest volume
first.
Also check the scf_xxx and output_xxx files if any warnings or numerical
overflows appear.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams;
What about L2NTV_V.outputorbup, any problematic messages seen in it
similar to "Conflict in atom orb. number" [1]?
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg07531.html
On 7/6/2017 8:46 AM, shamik chakrabarti wrote:
Dear Gerhard,
I have done 0%
This issue probably appeared already in older versions, here I found it with
the latest 17.1
When trying to use clmextrapol_lapw in a optimize job for a spin polarized case
with SO, it fails.
(note using dstart up/dn instead of clmextrapol works without problems)
I used Fe as simple test case
Dear Gerhard,
I have done 0% reduction during a normal SCF run, while
have done 6% reduction during volume optimization run. No, I have not
received any other error files other than uporb.error.
with regards,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Fecher, Gerhard
I guess youre rmt's are too large,
did you reduce them during initialisation (when saving the structure) to
account for the 10% volume reduction ?
Did you receive other error files that were not empty ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the
Dear Gerhard,
The calculation for original structure is running fine.
The error has come during the SCF of -10% structure. Why it has come during
structure optimization? Does it mean that 10% reduced structure is wrong in
such a way, the error appears during -orb calculation??
Dear Wien2k developers and users..
1- When it is useful to use LDA+U correction with constant V-matrix?.
2- Is it only applicable with LDA?
3- What are the necessary steps to do it?. Is the procedure, suggested by F
Tran, the only way to do LDA+U correction with constant V-matrix?
Obviously, you did not calculate anything
I think no one can help with that information
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
I followed the 'Quick start'(TiC) of userguide, and ran Volume Optimization,
however I didn't get any figure, and showed the below.
Would you please tell me where is my problem?
Thank you very much.
Optimize volume, c/a-ratio, ...
[http://localhost.localdomain:9206/tmp/89178-7175.png]
Download
and what is the problem ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and
there is nothing wrong
do not mix up compilation errors (there is none) from ifort, cc, or linking
with messages from make.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the
whoever you are,
I think you are answering the wrong topic
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H.
Does it run for your original structure ?
Did you first run a scf cycle for the original structure before you started
anything about optimization and the calculation converged ?
If not, you should try this first.
If you did, then put the first structure into a separate folder and try whether
Dear Gerhard,
Yes the error appears during volume optimization process.
For the first structure the error appears during SCF.
with regards,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:48 AM, 刘 洋 wrote:
> Thank you for your mail.
>
> I just found the Error during the
Does the error appear only during optimization or already in a regular scf
cycle ?
Is your structure correct ? (in most cases of questions here in the forum it is
not)
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is
20 matches
Mail list logo