The Cr (0, 0, 0.3302) and Ge (0, 0, 0.059) in R-3: h of both posts are
the same. So, it should be easy to see that.
In the struct file created by StructGen, you can also see that the Te
positions (which are in the R-3: r setting in the struct file) are the same:
ATOM -1: X=0.0887
Thank you, but I think that the usersguide should have a minimal explanation,
for example, the two lines that you wrote.
De: Wien en nombre de Gavin Abo
Enviado: domingo, 12 de noviembre de 2017
I find different data, I do not know if they are equivalent:
Title Crystallographic, magnetic and electronic structures of a new
layered
ferromagnetic compound Cr2 Ge2 Te6
Author(s) Carteaux, V.;Brunet, D.;Ouvrard, G.;Andre, G.
Reference Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Dear Prof. Alay/Peter/Marks/Stefaan or any expert user
As you know molecule calculations take much time (I received your reply to my
previous query) and as suggested by you all these molecules need some good HPC
facility that I do not have.
Therefore, to avoid the multiple heavy repetitive
I believe HD stands for high derivative. See where it says high
derivative LO (HDLO) in the Computer Physics Communications Vol. 220 p.
230 (2017) article:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.07.008
On 11/12/2017 8:22 AM, delamora wrote:
Dear Peter Blaha,
In the 17.1 version the HDLO and
I did this rather quickly. So you will have to double check if it looks
correct or not.
It looks like both your lattice parameters and atomic positions are in
the R-3 hexagonal setting. So enter in SETSTRU [
http://www.cryst.ehu.es/cryst/setstru.html ]:
# Comments start with #
# Space
Dear Peter Blaha,
In the 17.1 version the HDLO and LVNS appear;
atom 1 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS
I searched in the usersguide and I did not find much information;
For LVNS there is no explanation, all I found is in 5.1.3;
-lvns L -> in batch
Dear WIEN2k Users,
During NMR calculations, I found Warning when I run x_nmr_lapw-mode in1 for
creating the case.outputnmr_in1 file.
:WARNING ATOM= 80 L= 0 HIGH OVERLAP between radial functions 0.97
setting new lo energy: 0.30
Please suggest me to get rid of this warning.
Thanks and
I took Rkmax9.5, k-points 2000 with optimised lattice parameters and now I
am in agreement with the tutorial results (provided with wien2k).
Thanks and regards
Fatima!
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:04 AM, fatima DFT wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> Server is not allowing may to send
9 matches
Mail list logo