It was just mentioned 2 days ago on the mailing list: The total energy
:ENE is usually NOT a good criterion for a convergence test, as it is
most of the time NOT necessary to converge this number to mRy.
a) You have to consider your RMTs of Li, Ga and Te and calculate the
"effective RKMAX"
Bluntly, the system administrators did their tests wrong. Wien2k does not
do extensive data exchange, i.e. use the file system as virtual memory. I
suspect that they did some simple test on a bulk system with many k-point,
not using SCRATCH, then incorrectly extrapolated. (They might also have
I convinced for band structure, thanks Sir!
for k-mesh: No!! I am using same k-mesh as used in scf.on saved pbe_scf >
inithf (2x2x2 mesh) > run_kgen (2x2x2 mesh)> run_lapw ... -hf
and then DOS> optic> band.
On Tuesday 20 February 2018, 2:17:59 PM IST,
wrote:
Hi,
For band structure:
the error message about the QTL stuff is important only if you are
interested in showing also the character of the bands in the plot.
If this is the case then, execute run_bandplothf_lapw with "-qtl":
run_bandplothf_lapw -p -qtl.
For optics:
Are you using a different
Dear F. Tran Sir,
I followed your advice and I calculated the properties in this order: DOSS,
optical and band structure.for DOS I do not see any problem now. I also see the
band structure seems calculated but with an error message and I am getting
error for optical prop and the error message
Respected Wien2k user,
This is my first email to the mailing list.
I am doing DFT calculations for LiGaTe2.
As per FAQ of Wien2k for a system having Li, RKmax 4.5 is enough:
http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac .at/reg_user/faq/rkmax.html
I wanted to optimize this value and performed optimization
6 matches
Mail list logo