Re: [Wien] Energy converged but charge not converging for charged supercell

2020-06-07 Thread Laurence Marks
..from a Fe .. _ Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi www.numis.northwestern.edu On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 17:44 Laurence Marks wrote: > To get it to converge, you need to have a sensible model

Re: [Wien] Energy converged but charge not converging for charged supercell

2020-06-07 Thread Laurence Marks
To get it to converge, you need to have a sensible model [1]. Ta substitution for Ti in STO is a n-type semiconductor. Think it through. If a small structure like this takes "too long", you need more resources. [1] Someone recently sent me a structure which would not converge. It had a H atom 1

Re: [Wien] Energy converged but charge not converging for charged supercell

2020-06-07 Thread Ashwani Kumar
RMTs are Sr:2.05, Ti:1.70, Ta:1.80, O:1.55. For your reference, structure file is attached. 6 k points in IBZ (ndiv:3, 3, 3), simple GGA calculation. **"With expected RMTs for STO I don't expect rkmax=5.5 to be adequate"** Yes Dr. Marks, I agree with you. 6.5 would have been ok. But i need

Re: [Wien] Energy converged but charge not converging for charged supercell

2020-06-07 Thread Laurence Marks
You are still not providing information. With expected RMTs for STO I don't expect rkmax=5.5 to be adequate, and 4.0 is silly. I think your chemistry is wrong as well. _ Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought",

Re: [Wien] Energy converged but charge not converging for charged supercell

2020-06-07 Thread Ashwani Kumar
Hello Dr. Marks, I could not explain myself due to 40 kb size limitation. I want to calculate EFG, asymmetry parameter at Ta in Ta-doped Strontium titanate (3x3x3) supercell. Replaced 1 Ti atom with Ta atom. SCF converged well for neutral supercell (Ta in +4 OS). Then did force convergence and