Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-31 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, I am deeply grateful for your assistance.I have finally understood the 'klist' by examining the 'klist_band' generated by xcrysden. It turns out that the coordinates within the 'klist' are referenced to the conventional reciprocal basis rather than the primitive

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-22 Thread Peter Blaha
-- Original -- From: "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users" ; Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2024 04:36 PM To: "wien"; Subject: Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen In outputkgen the direct and reciprocal bravais matrices are printed. They can be used to multiply the cor

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-22 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Thank you very much for your reply. I apologize if I may have been a bit persistent, but unfortunately, the issue still persists. Your recent emails have been explaining concepts that I already understand, or at least, I believe I fully comprehend the explanations of

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-22 Thread Peter Blaha
istance with this matter. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. best regards -- Original -- From: "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users" ; Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2024 03:17 PM To:

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-22 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to express my gratitude for your prompt reply. I truly appreciate the time and effort you have taken to assist me with my query. However, I apologize for any misunderstanding. While I do have a grasp of the concepts

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-22 Thread Peter Blaha
umns is just 2nd,3rd,4th column of klist divided by 4, but what is the meaning of the right 3 columns? best regards -- Original -- *From:* "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users" ; *Date:* Thu, Mar 21, 2024 03:48 PM *To:* "wien"; *Subject:* Re:

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-21 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Sorry again, the format of the file content looks really weird when it appears in the mail archive. I don't know what's going on. I've attached two files here. best regards I4mmm.klist Description: Binary data I4mmm.outputkgen Description: Binary data

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-21 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Sorry for the wrong format of previous email. I hope this email is fine. Thank you so much for your reply. But I think you might have misunderstood me. I understand the difference between internal and cartesian coordinates. Let me take for example, Let us generate

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-21 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Thank you so much for your reply. But I think you might have misunderstood me. I understand the difference between internal and cartesian coordinates. Let me take for example, Let us generate 4x4x4 mesh by 'x kgen -fbz' for CaFe2As2 I4/mmm structure. The klist is as

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-21 Thread Peter Blaha
t;10 10 10" really refers? Please help. Thank you very much. Best regards, -- Original -- *From:* "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users" ; *Date:* Wed, Mar 20, 2024 05:48 AM *To:* "wien"; *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen Hi, Yes, my fix was

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-20 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Thank you very much for your new fix. I have another question. When we generate an fbz 10x10x10 non-shifted kmesh for CaFe2As2, the klist file contains 1000 points. However, many of these points fall outside the 10x10x10 range. For example, the 560th point is listed

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-19 Thread Peter Blaha
* Mon, Mar 11, 2024 08:33 PM *To:* "wien"; *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen Ups. Here it comes. Am 11.03.2024 um 13:26 schrieb balabi via Wien: > Dear Prof. Peter Blaha > > Thank you so much for your reply! But I can not find your attachment of >

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-19 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, I think I found another issue with kgen -1 mode especially concerned with I4/mmm symmetry. As previously mentioned, the '-1' mode of kgen generates uneven k divisions, as you rightly pointed out. However, I've observed potential issues with the weight of the uneven k

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-12 Thread balabi via Wien
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Thank you so much! It works! best regards --Original-- From: "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users"

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-11 Thread Peter Blaha
-- Original -- *From:* "A Mailing list for WIEN2k users" ; *Date:* Mon, Mar 11, 2024 04:03 PM *To:* "wien"; *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen Hi, Thank you very much for your report. I can confirm the problem. Both, for bct and bco lattices (body

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-11 Thread balabi via Wien
DearProf. Peter Blaha Thank you so much for your reply! But I can not find your attachment of bravai.f.gz best regards --Original-- From:

Re: [Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-11 Thread Peter Blaha
Hi, Thank you very much for your report. I can confirm the problem. Both, for bct and bco lattices (body-centered tetragonal or orthorhombic) kgen enforced in default modes equal divisions of the reciprocal lattice vectors (as it should be for bcc). This was not a good choice and the

[Wien] Inconsistency in kgen

2024-03-10 Thread 巴拉比 via Wien
Dear wien2k developers and users, I am using wien2k 23.2 and working with CaFe2As2 structure which has I4/mmm symmetry. I am trying to generate klist using kgen. The kgen has several mode: the 1st mode is to specify k-mesh density NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 for 3 divisions of K,