Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-19 Thread Ramsewak Kashyap
gt; calculation > > > is at 0 K) > > > * Maybe the Ta atom is associated with a defect (vacancy, > oxygen,…) > > > and the experiment measures that complex. > > > * … > > > > > > Stefaan >

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-19 Thread Peter Blaha
s mailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>> > *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG > > atomic positions  optimization means force relaxation.. I have did that. > but I am asking about cell parameter optimization. Is

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Ramsewak Kashyap
easures that complex. > > * … > > > > Stefaan > > > > *From:*Wien *On Behalf Of > > *Ramsewak Kashyap > > *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 12:41 PM > > *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users > > *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Large difference i

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Peter Blaha
ay, March 18, 2019 12:23 PM *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users mailto:wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>> *Subject:* [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG Hi Wien2k users, I am doing EFG calculation for TiNi monoclinic phase, but I am gettin

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Ramsewak Kashyap
t; > Stefaan > > > > > > > > *From:* Wien *On Behalf Of *Ramsewak > Kashyap > *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 12:41 PM > *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users > *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG > > > > atomic

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
with a defect (vacancy, oxygen,…) and the experiment measures that complex. * … Stefaan From: Wien On Behalf Of Ramsewak Kashyap Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 12:41 PM To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG atomic

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Ramsewak Kashyap
imization of the atomic positions is absolutely necessary to have > a meaningful value for Vzz and eta in a supercell. > > > > Stefaan > > > > > > *From:* Wien *On Behalf Of *Ramsewak > Kashyap > *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2019 12:23 PM > *To:* A Mailing list for

Re: [Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
Yes, optimization of the atomic positions is absolutely necessary to have a meaningful value for Vzz and eta in a supercell. Stefaan From: Wien On Behalf Of Ramsewak Kashyap Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 12:23 PM To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: [Wien] Large difference

[Wien] Large difference in calculated and experimental EFG

2019-03-18 Thread Ramsewak Kashyap
Hi Wien2k users, I am doing EFG calculation for TiNi monoclinic phase, but I am getting large difference in Calculated and measured value, I have taken parameters from COD, then make 2x2x2 supercell and replace one Ti with Ta atom... is structural optimization is necessary?? and eta value was