all the compounds are having the same space group -> That's interesting
that they are all space group 1_P1. Do they all have the same number of
atoms/nonequivalent positions? If so, the compiler might not be the
cause of the issue. Steps from when I installed oneAPI if they help are
at [1].
Thank you so much.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 20:42, Laurence Marks
wrote:
>
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/guide/installation-guide-for-oneapi-toolkits.html
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:56 AM naincy Pandit
> wrote:
>
>> can you please guide me on the steps of how to
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/guide/installation-guide-for-oneapi-toolkits.html
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:56 AM naincy Pandit
wrote:
> can you please guide me on the steps of how to install one API?
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 20:09, Peter Blaha wrote:
>
>> >
can you please guide me on the steps of how to install one API?
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 20:09, Peter Blaha wrote:
> > opticplot or J is not possible because numbers are missing from the
> > table absorb and others also are having NaN
> >
> > case.joint. the file is completely ok and having the
opticplot or J is not possible because numbers are missing from the
table absorb and others also are having NaN
case.joint. the file is completely ok and having the numbers not NaN
If case.joint is ok, opticplot "J" should be possible.
Only for the other options, the necessary files are
I read your mail sir and checked the possibilities.
opticplot or J is not possible because numbers are missing from the table
absorb and others also are having NaN
case.joint. the file is completely ok and having the numbers not NaN
as i m working on it, from the previous work my steps are
You did not read my previous email completely, or at least did not
answer it:
> Use opticplot and plot "J", i.e. the unbroadened eplsilon-2 in
> case.joint. Is this ok or already in this file some NaNs ?
Then we
> know that the steps before kram are ok.
Can you plot the
It "might" be a problem caused by the compiler then.
You mentioned using Intel Fortran compiler (parallel studio) [1].
If you search the list, there were reports in the past of I/O issues
with big data files with some older Intel Fortran compiler versions.
One such post is [2].
Your 1_P1
previously also i worked on it and have not faced this type of problem
and yes. i have completed this optics work for more than 4 compounds and
completely worked
previously case.inkram file contains this
0.1Gamma: broadening of interband spectrum
0.0energy shift (scissors operator)
We (you) have first to find out if this is the first error, or the
problem is already in previous steps.
Use opticplot and plot "J", i.e. the unbroadened eplsilon-2 in
case.joint. Is this ok or already in this file some NaNs ? Then we
know that the steps before kram are ok.
If this is
D*ear Prof. Blaha Sir and Wien2k users,*
i am working with Wien2k_19.1 version with Ubuntu 22.04 i need to get
some suggestions for optical properties of chalcogenide perovskites of
orthorhombic phase.
i have constructed the structural file with space group p_1.
the purpose of my calculation is
D*ear Prof. Blaha Sir and Wien2k users,*
i am working with Wien2k_19.1 version with Ubuntu 22.04 i need to get
some suggestions for optical properties of chalcogenide perovskites of
orthorhombic phase.
i have constructed the structural file with space group p_1.
the purpose of my calculation is
Please read the "netiquette" instructions at
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/mailing_list/ on posting to this list. You
have not provided enough material for anyone to help.
N.B., 19.1 is very old, so you should update.
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
I am running wien2k 19.1 on a machine of type Linux with the Ubuntu 22.04
LTS, intel fortran compiler (parallel studio)
the purpose of my calculation is to get the files to plot graphs
using w2web for the calculation of Optical properties, I m getting NaN
errors and I m not able to plot graphs.
recommended by you
Le jeudi 7 mai 2020 à 02:02:18 UTC+1, djamel slamnia
a écrit :
all
Le jeudi 7 mai 2020 à 02:01:15 UTC+1, Laurence Marks
a écrit :
Why do you want to fix them? In general that is (IMHO) bad science.
What do you want to fix? X, y, z or all?
---
Prof
all
Le jeudi 7 mai 2020 à 02:01:15 UTC+1, Laurence Marks
a écrit :
Why do you want to fix them? In general that is (IMHO) bad science.
What do you want to fix? X, y, z or all?
---
Prof Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everyone else has seen, and to think what nobody else
has
yes that what i want to fix certain atom positions
for this positions : ATOM 1 position1 :X= 0.8867 Y=0.6667 Z=0.7500
> position2 :X= 0. Y=0.2200 Z=0.4167
> position3 X= 0.77996667 Y=0.1133 Z=0.0833
>
> ATOM2 position1X=0.2539 Y=0.2554 Z=0.6602
>
thanks a lot for reply Mr Blaha
yes it will be creat it automaticaly but we have to change the file case.inM
according to positions of atoms
Le mercredi 6 mai 2020 à 21:14:14 UTC+1, Peter Blaha
a écrit :
Yes, you need a case.inM file.
But don't worry, it will be created
I recommend none.
Fixing all atoms is the same as not minimizing internal positions.
---
Prof Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everyone else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu
On Wed, May 6, 2020, 20:05 djamel slamnia
Why do you want to fix them? In general that is (IMHO) bad science.
What do you want to fix? X, y, z or all?
---
Prof Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everyone else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu
On Wed, May 6, 2020,
dear wien2k user's for minimisation positions: i need case.inM for
position below ???
ATOM 1 position1 :X=0.8867 Y=0.6667 Z=0.7500
position2:X= 0. Y=0.2200 Z=0.4167
position3 X= 0.77996667 Y=0.1133 Z=0.0833
ATOM2 position1 X=0.2539
No, you do not have to change case.inM unless you want to fix certain atom
positions (not recommended by me). Only to be done by experts please.
If you have an old case.inM from some related but different structure in
the diretory, delete it -- a correct one will be generated for you when it
is
Yes, you need a case.inM file.
But don't worry, it will be created automatically for you when you run
run_lapw -min
Am 06.05.2020 um 21:52 schrieb djamel slamnia:
*dear wien2k user's *
*for minimisation positions: i need case.inM for position below ???*
ATOM 1 position1 :X= 0.8867
The general installation steps between previous WIEN2k versions and the
latest WIEN2k 19.1 has not changed.
1. You still go to the WIEN2k website:
http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/index.html
2. Click on the "Code download (after registration)" link followed by
entering your User
Registration-ID isWIEN2k-3237
We are installing Wien2k on the supercomputing center,Can you send us
detailed installation documentation for WIEN2k?
We would be appreciated if you reply us.___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Since other BoltzTraP2 users might have seen that error before, it would
be better to ask your question below in the BoltzTraP2 Users group.
Information on that Users group can be found on the BoltzTraP2 website [1].
That error might happen if you don't have BoltzTraP2 installed. How was
it
Dear Wien, I am Prakash g from India. During BolzTraP2 code running I saw this error message. I am looking for your reply. Please help me to resolve this problem. sh: line 22: btp2: command not found
___
Wien mailing list
ember 2019 17:56
An: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: [Wien] help
Dear wien2k admin,
I am getting Error while during initialize calc. in wien2k16. How
to resolve it myself. Please help me.
Thank you.
STDOUT
[1m next is setrmt (B[m
[1m next is nn (B[m
Note: The followin
Dear wien2k admin, I am getting Error while during initialize calc. in wien2k16. How to resolve it myself. Please help me.Thank you. STDOUT [1m next is setrmt (B[m[1m next is nn (B[mNote: The following floating-point exceptions are signalling: IEEE_DIVIDE_BY_ZEROSTOP NN ENDS please
On Thu, 7 Nov, 2019, 10:06 PM Prakash Govindaraj, wrote:Dear wien2k admin, I am getting Error while during initialize calc. in wien2k16. How to resolve it myself. Please help me.Thank you. STDOUT [1m next is setrmt (B[m[1m next is nn (B[mNote: The following
Dear Wien2k users and developers
I am using wienncm to do some non-collinear magnetic calculations. I have
compiled wienncm successfully
with intel mpiifort version 15.0.4 and mkl (composer_xe_2015.5.223), and I am
able to run wien2k in
both serial and parallel mode. But the noncollinear
Thanks a lot for your response, Prof. Blaha.
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
, 2019 10:25:44 PM
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] Help on Core hole calculations
See the end
===
So, you are saying that from this file
Title
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
10.263863 10.263863 10.263863 55.256000 55.256000 55.256000
See the end
===
So, you are saying that from this file
Title
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
10.263863 10.263863 10.263863 55.256000 55.256000 55.256000
ATOM -1: X=0.3550 Y=0.3550 Z=0.3550
ATOM -1:X= 0.6450 Y=0.6450 Z=0.6450
ATOM
,
Col. Crédito Constructor, C.P. 03940
Del. Benito Juárez, México D. F.
From: Wien on behalf of delamora
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 12:35:58 PM
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] Help on Core hole calculations
Sorry
It should be
P LATTICE
Sorry
It should be
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 4 =>
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
Sorry
It should be
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 4 =>
P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
even with 1x1x1 create a 3 times (conventional hexagonal) cell.
Instead,
i) remove the
Dear Prof. Blaha
Thank you for your valuable feedback, I appreciate it very much. I still do not
know how to create the structure file. Please see below.
No. You should not run a supercell for a R structure, since this will
even with 1x1x1 create a 3 times (conventional hexagonal) cell.
Hi
Thanks for your answer, I am aware it is a long text, sorry for that, I'll keep
in mind for future mails. Thanks for the recommendation I'll try it, Prof.
Blaha already replied to my questions.
Best regards
Israel
On Friday, May 17, 2019, 6:39:01 AM GMT-6, delamora
wrote:
Estimado Israel,
You make long questions, and people do not read them
What about this cell
R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 3 161_R3c
9.519303 9.519303 26.005203 90.00 90.00120.00
ATOM -1: X=0.1450 Y=0.1450 Z=0.1450
Fe1NPT= 781 R0=0.5000 RMT= 1.97Z:
I have read some of the discussions in the mailing list
(https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg11037.html)
and somewhere else but I couldn’t find some useful information to solve my
doubts; I actually got more confused. I am doing core hole calculations for
Dear all
I few days ago I sent this email but I noticed that it appears in the mailing
list as SING IN ALERT and since I have not received any reply I thought that
perhaps it was considered as a malicious mail. So I decided to send it again
through this email account. I apologise if this
thanks. i worked out the example of TiC (just to make sure everygthing
working fine, compared with one of the lecture of WIEN2K workshop). there
are miniscule difference in values (Observed in UTILITIES--> analysis or
energy values of bands in dos) but overall data is same. thanks you Mr.
Gavin
- Původní e-mail --
Od: Gavin Abo
Komu: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Datum: 24. 10. 2018 4:19:56
Předmět: Re: [Wien] Help Request for making WIEN2K (ver18.2) programs
executable.
"Those gfortran warnings have been seen in symmetry [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.
Those gfortran warnings have been seen in symmetry [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg17396.html
] and dstart [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg17389.html
], which if I recall correctly were resolved by the fixes seen on the
thank you, Program compiled successfully withour any error. I tried to
remove manually but still some error occurred, Followed Mr. Gavin's method
(from previous thread) for LIBXC link to R_LIBS. Done successfully. But
while running an example of TiC (to check everything is fine), STDOUT file
shows
You likely need to use -lblas for libblas.so and -llapack for
liblapack.so installed with "sudo yum install lapack-devel".
A basic WIEN2k serial install with gfortran/cc on Fedora seems quite
similar to Ubuntu [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg17911.html
,
See comments below.
here is correct inst configuration from attached struct file:
This configuration is uddu and not udud. Right?
The answer to the above question depends on how you define udud. It is
udud if you define it as follows.
For the "instgen_lapw -ask" input and case.inst below,
With instgen_lapw, you specify just ud or dn in that case as you have
two nonequivalent positions. Thus, only the one u and one d that you
see in case.inst. However, you have a multiplicity of 2 for each of the
two nonequivalent positions. So one of the nonequivalent Fe positions
From the files you sent, I never get Cm space group.
Anyway, if it is antiferromagnetic, it has only TWO Fe sites, one with
spin-up and one with dn.
So I used your struct file, but the 4 Fe atoms should probably not be
splitted into 1-4, but into two positions, each with multiplicity 2,
Dear Wien2k Users and Experts,
We already got sufficient help from Dr. Gavin in this case but we are not
convinced from the space group point of view.
With the original CIF file (attached), we want to check the ground state energy
of the AFM case of "Cs3Fe2Cl9" (conventional standard and
Dear Gavin
Just to let you know that I applied the patches you suggested for the band
structure and it worked. Thanks again.
Regards
Israel
On Thursday, June 21, 2018, 11:17:07 PM MDT, Gavin Abo
wrote:
That is due to a known bug in WIEN2k 17.1
Dear Gavin Abo
Thank you very much for your help. I am sorry for my late reply, I was quite
busy these days. I will try to apply one of those patches and see what happens.
Regarding the account, I would like to have several remote users each working
on one calculation at a time, since it is
That is due to a known bug in WIEN2k 17.1 [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg17218.html
]. It can be quite the effort to apply the fixes to WIEN2k 17.1 that
are mentioned in the mailing list (such as those mentioned at
Good day
I hope anyone can help me with the following problems. I am working with
gfortran installed on linux mint 18.3, (16 GB RAM, 260 GB disk space, intel i7,
2.7 GHz) wien2k 17.1.
I just installed wien2k and it seems that the installation went well. So I
decided to test the software
Several points:
1) The *WARNING* is exactly that. You need to look at :FCHECK. Because your
structure does not have inversion symmetry the origin if not fixed. The sum
of the forces (:FCHECK) should be small; the current threshold for the
warning is too small in my opionion. If they are 1E-3 or
Hello wien2k users,
I am working on complex metallic structure(30 atoms), while relaxing structure
in scf, i use forces to relax with
runsp_lapw -ec 0.01 -cc 0.0001 -fc 0.1 -i 40 -p at 12*12*1 k mesh, after
150+ cycles graping warning command i receive following error(grep -e WARNING
*.scf
For "make" (serial wannier90.x and parallel postw90.x versions), it
looks like you need mpi installed. So try "make wannier" instead to
build only the serial wannier90.x.
Where did you run the "cp ./config/make.inc.ifort ./make.inc"? Maybe it
got executed in a different directory or
Dear all WIEN2k users,
We are trying to install Wannier90 in Wien17 version of Wien2k. We have
followed the steps of README.
In Our setup, We have ifort compiler & used serial version of Wien2k.
and we have also not installed MPI.
We followed the steps as:
cp ./config/make.inc.ifort
No, you cannot preserve symmetry -- think about it!
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Chouaib AHMANI FERDI <
ahmaniferdichou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Wien users,
>
> I would like to know if it can be possible to reduce the calculation time
> by preserving symmetry and replacing one atom of
Hello Wien users,
I would like to know if it can be possible to reduce the calculation time
by preserving symmetry and replacing one atom of the non equivalent atoms
with the doping atom. If possible, how ?
The case structure is LiMn2O4 (space group : fd3m) and the doping atom is
Ni which gives
Hi,
It is not from experiment, from theoretical investigation, yes it does not
exist.
Best Regards,
2017-03-29 14:22 GMT+03:00 hüsnü kara :
> Hi,
>
> I mean that with mBJ and without mBJ. It is 0.6 eV without mBJ, 0.5 eV
> with mBJ
>
> Best Regards,
>
> 2017-03-29 13:43
nz
and
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids
01187 Dresden
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von hüsnü kara
[husnukar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 12:43
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [
Hi,
I mean that with mBJ and without mBJ. It is 0.6 eV without mBJ, 0.5 eV with
mBJ
Best Regards,
2017-03-29 13:43 GMT+03:00 hüsnü kara :
> Dear Wien Users,
>
> I study on magnetic quaternary-Heusler alloys. I did band structure
> calculations with GGA and GGA+mBJ
EN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] Help about mBJ
Dear Wien Users,
I study on magnetic quaternary-Heusler alloys. I did band structure
calculations with GGA and GGA+mBJ approximations. I concluded that bandga
Dear Wien Users,
I study on magnetic quaternary-Heusler alloys. I did band structure
calculations with GGA and GGA+mBJ approximations. I concluded that bandgaps
with GGA+mBJ are smaller than ones with GGA. So could I tell that GGA+mBJ
approximation is not appopriate for quaternary-Heusler alloys?
The subscriber list shows that you are subscribed as a digest member.
So I don't think you will get posts immediately and have to wait until
all posts are combined for the day. If you want individual emails for
each post and to receive them almost immediately, then you need to:
1) Go to:
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
See section "4.5.9 modified Becke-Johnson potential (mBJ) for band gaps"
in the WIEN2k 14.2 usersguide [
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/usersguide.pdf ].
There it mentions that you need in case.in0_grr:
EX_GRR VX_GRR
However, it looks like you probably get that error if you just
when we give XC_MBJ in the file in0_grr to run mBJ the following error
occur,
lapw0 -grr is only for grr or screened exchange
> stop error
Regards
--
Dr. G. Murtaza
Assistant Professor
Centre for Advanced Studies in Physics, 1-Church road
G.C University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mobile#
hysics of Solids
01187 Dresden
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von Rishi Singh
[rishising...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016 07:36
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] Help
Dear Wien2k and Boltztrap users
Dear Wien2k and Boltztrap users and Developers
Greetings from me. Plz help me.
I am working with Boltztrap using Wien2k.
I used following steps
1. SCF calculations have been converged with wien2k
2. I copied case.struct and case.energy fro wien2k working directory of
compound and pest into GdFe2
[rishising...@gmail.com <javascript:;>]
> Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juli 2016 08:00
> An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> Betreff: [Wien] Help
>
> Dear Wien2k and Boltztrap users and Developers
> Greetings from me. Plz help me.
> I am working with Boltztrap using Wien2k.
>
[rishising...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juli 2016 08:00
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] Help
Dear Wien2k and Boltztrap users and Developers
Greetings from me. Plz help me.
I am working with Boltztrap using Wien2k.
I used following steps
1. SCF calculations have been
Dear Wien2k and Boltztrap users and Developers
Greetings from me. Plz help me.
I am working with Boltztrap using Wien2k.
I used following steps
1. SCF calculations have been converged with wien2k
2. I copied case.struct and case.energy fro wien2k working directory of
compound and pest into GdFe2
Question is, is there anything wrong? Are these parts of ERROR messages
or at least WARNINGS, or are they just echoes, your job(s) telling you
what they are doing?
---
Dr. Martin Pieper
Karl-Franzens University
Institute of Physics
Universitätsplatz 5
A-8010 Graz
Austria
Tel.:
Dear all users,
When I submit a job, some messages like "
cd $PWD; $t $exe ${def}_${loop}.def $loop; rm -f .lock_$lockfile[$p] ) >>
.time2_$loop
LAPW2 END
" will be obtained. Can anyone tell what's wrong with it?
___
Wien mailing list
Previous advice for troubleshooting the SELECT error with E-top of -200
can be found at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg14046.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg12625.html
On 6/27/2016 3:08 PM, ADIL ES-SMAIRI wrote:
Dear
Dear Blaha sir,I want to optimize the structure but the calculation stops and
displays the following message.
how I can solve this problems:
** Error in Parallel LAPW1
** LAPW1 STOPPED at ن يون 27 13:07:33 WET 2016
** check ERROR FILES!
'SELECT' - no energy limits found for atom 1 L=
Deaar all user of wien2k,i have a question concerning when i increase the
lattice parameters c from 6 A to 20 the calcul can' doing.and gives this
messages
"error: command /home/adil/softwars/WIEN2k/lapw2cpara -c lapw2.def failed
2.9u 0.1s 0:02.49 122.4% 0+0k 0+6408io 0pf+0w
** LAPW2
Thanks a lot prof. Blaha.
Now it is working well.
kind regard
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Peter Blaha
wrote:
>
>
>
> f. Now i ran
>>
>> $ElaSticROOT/ElaStic_submit_WIEN2k.sh
>>
>> and calculations worked properly with this command no any erroe.
>>
>> But
f. Now i ran
$ElaSticROOT/ElaStic_submit_WIEN2k.sh
and calculations worked properly with this command no any erroe.
But when i ran
$ElaSticROOT/ElaStic_Save_Clean_WIEN2k
It is saying
bash: ./ElaStic_Save_Clean_WIEN2k: Permission denied
do:
ls -als
Dear Wien2k users and developers,
Greetings from me.
I am workind with ElaStic_1.0 for calcualtios of second order elastic
constants and others.
1. I installed ElaStic_1.0 sucessfully
2. I am doing calculations for TiC and I followed the following procedure.
a. I made a directory TiC in ElaStic
Hello Abo Following your advise now I am doing my calculation correctly. Thank
you
Regards Tankhilaa
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:22 PM, Gavin Abo gs...@crimson.ua.edu wrote:
Yes, you can run x pairhess -copy in a terminal.
or
In w2web, you can click single prog. under
Instead of doing delta=0, set the first 3 numbers to zero (if you are
fixing x,y z), i.e.
0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 #Atom1 Generated by pairhess
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:43 PM, B Tankhilsaihan tankhi...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Dear Abo
thank you for your reply
I am using w2web. But i do not
Dear Abo thank you for your reply I am using w2web. But i do not understand how
to run x pairhess -copy. Do i need to run it from terminal? I am newby for
Wien2k can you give me some instuction to run x pairhess -copy?
Best regardsBatsaikhan.T
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:53 PM, Gavin
Hello Dear Peter BlahaI am running on WIEN2k_13.01 version The purpose of my
calculation is to do structure relaxation of LiFePO4 with Li displacement.I
have done SCF calculation for my structure and now i would like to do geometry
minimization with mini_position but i can not constrain Li
After you edited case.inM, did you run x pairhess -copy as it mentions
in the post at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg07226.html
On 5/21/2015 9:19 AM, B Tankhilsaihan wrote:
Hello Dear Peter Blaha
I am running on WIEN2k_13.01 version
The purpose of my
On 20.05.2015 09:20, Rishi Singh wrote:
I have calculated the magnetic moment of TbFe3
having (166 R-3m symmetry)
rhombohedral with hexagonal phase. It comes to be as
Magnetic moment in interstitial region:0.04754
Magnetic moment on sphere one:5.37467
Magnetic moment on
Hi,
We have looked at this problem and it seems that there is a bug in the
DFTD3 package. The forces are wrong for the Becke-Johnson (bj) damping
function when they are calculated analytically. Unfortunately, this is
just what corresponds to the default choice in case.indftd3.
We will mention
Dear users and developers,
i am using DFT-D3 for calculation of structure optimization of bulk MoS2. For
the minimum energy structure (calculated by including dftd3) there is huge a
net attractive force on the S atom (-2810 mRy/bohr). When I am trying to
minimize the forces, the energy of
Respected Researcher
If you find it so annoying just refer the emails to spam. In case you change
your mind in future then you can un-spam the emails from wien mailing list.
Best wishes
Masood
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:48 AM, Gavin Abo gs...@crimson.ua.edu wrote:
You used the
I'm not sure it's a good idea to teach antispam systems that the wien
mailing list is spam. It may propagate depending on the setup.
Regards,
Michael Sluydts
Masood Yousaf schreef op 21/01/2014 11:05:
Respected Researcher
If you find it so annoying just refer the emails to spam. In case you
Dear Sir,
I was unaware of the unsubscription process. Filtering emails is another option
but surely unsubscription is safest among all.
Best wishes
Masood
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:08 PM, Michael Sluydts
michael.sluy...@ugent.be wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea to teach
From where did you get the structure ?? It is really P1 ??
Did you remove the the 1,2,3,.. from Fe1, Fe2,..Ga1,Ga2,... ???
Maybe there is some rounding error in the positions which prevents
higher symmetry ??
On 01/20/2014 08:55 AM, Chinedu Ekuma wrote:
Dear Peter,
The structure is the
Dear Peter,
The original structure was a CXZ structure but for the AFM calculations, I made
all the multiplicity to be 1 and then after that, running x sgroup lead to the
reduction in the symmetry.
Ekuma
On Monday, January 20, 2014 3:19 AM,
This is the wrong strategy. I expected that it is C-centered.
How many Fe positions do you have in CXZ ?
Try to play with the magnetic configurations in this symmetry first.
Eventually you could give up the C-centering and make the formerly
centered-atoms antiferromagnetic to the other ones.
Dear Peter,
Thanks for the explanations. There were four inequivalent Fe positions in the
original structure. Kindly see as attached the original structure. I am a bit
confused when you said that I should first play with the magnetic structure in
the first symmetry. What happens to the
So you have 4 non-equivalent Fe and in total 9 Fe atoms in the cell.
If you don't know anything about magnetism:
1) do it ferromagnetic
2) try out various ferri-magnetic situations (like 1-3=up, 4=dn; but
also others). Compare total energies. Of course with 9 Fe atoms you
cannot generate a
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo