Dear, Prof. Blaha,
Thank you for your modification. It works on my Linux box.
However,
tail -n +2
may be more compatible with other unix variant (like AIX).
Best regards,
--
Masao Arai
NIMS, Japan
Thank you very much for your clear analysis of the problem.
Since I do not have the Linux
Ok.
PS: Apparently the plain tail -N and head -N commands work on your
Linux box, i.e. the problems are only when +N is used ?
Masao ARAI schrieb:
Dear, Prof. Blaha,
Thank you for your modification. It works on my Linux box.
However,
tail -n +2
may be more compatible with other
By default, lapw0 uses a very dense FFT-mesh (because of the
xc-potential in GGA). This is not necessary for your purpose.
Use the ifflim routines to find the necessary FFT-dimensions for your
case (see DO 40 loop in lapw0.F and subsequent ifflim calls). They
should be (2*Gmax)+1 AND a
Looking on these numbers tells me, that you probably should invest into
ifort + mkl. It does not make sense to buy expensive new hardware, but
with bad software it runs slower than on a 6 year old PC.
Compare your timing with the benchmark page to see what is possible.
k-point parallelization:
4 matches
Mail list logo