You are right, I got something mixed up. Now it is working. Seems to be the
only mistake was to only give one node in the machines file. Thank you very
much.
Von: wien-bounces at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [wien-bounces at
zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im
Realy not a good idea,
if you have C on the surface, what C is it ? CO, hydrocarbon, graphite ? All
have a different binding energy of the C 1s !
I suggest, if youre sample is not to be supposed to contain C, you should clean
it.
XPS energies have to be calibrated using the Au (or Ag) Fermi
At 11:19 18/09/2008, you wrote:
Realy not a good idea,
if you have C on the surface, what C is it ? CO, hydrocarbon,
graphite ? All have a different binding energy of the C 1s !
I suggest, if youre sample is not to be supposed to contain C, you
should clean it.
This is not my own choice (I
We need to differentiate two things:
a) How one removes any offsets experimentally with an insulator. Often
cleaning the sample is not an option -- this may also destroy it.
b) What reference level one should use in a Wien calculation: the T=0
Fermi energy, the T=Room Temperature Fermi Energy
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20080918/44a0f83d/attachment.html
5 matches
Mail list logo
