[Wien] Reg: Angle (Theta)dependent dHvA frequencies with SKEAF code

2020-05-20 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Rourke, Is it possible to calculate angle dependent dHvA frequencies with SKEAF code. At the time of initialization of calculation it tis taking default Theta as zero degree. I need to get the frequencies from 0 degree to 90 degree in step of 10 degree. Is it possible? Thanking you.

Re: [Wien] Reg: Error in irrep step in FM case

2019-10-18 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
n mpi case: make rp; make cp > > > Thanks for the report > > Regards > > > On 10/16/19 12:12 PM, Peter Blaha wrote: > > I can only try to reproduce your problem. > > > > Please send me your struct file and the case.klist_band file where the > > pro

Re: [Wien] Reg: Error in irrep step in FM case

2019-10-15 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
2811.html > [6] > https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg18527.html > > On 10/14/2019 6:30 AM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: > > Dear Wien2k, > > Recently i am facing an error while running x irrep -up and x irrep -dn > commands. > The error is &qu

[Wien] Reg: Error in irrep step in FM case

2019-10-14 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, Recently i am facing an error while running x irrep -up and x irrep -dn commands. The error is "rotkv: cannot find (k+K)inv(Ri)" The SCF is completed quite well. But facing problem to get the band structure. The upirrep.def file is showing as below 5, 'FM.irrepup',

Re: [Wien] Reg: Band structure with SOC for spin polarised case

2019-04-15 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Hi, the following link will useful. https://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=Error+while+running+band+structure+SP%2BSO+case+in+parallel=wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:14 AM Gavin Abo wrote: > Sorry, too busy at the moment to search in the mailing list archive >

[Wien] Reg: Error in running of wannier90 with AFM+SOC+U

2019-03-26 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I have successfully completed scf, band and dos calculations with AFM+SOC+U. The flow of commands to initiate the wannier90 calculations are > (init_w2w) options: -up -so > (x) kgen -fbz > (x) wannier90 -pp > (x) lapw1 -up -orb -p > (x) lapw1 -dn -orb -p > (x) lapwso -up -orb -p >

Re: [Wien] Reg: Will -qtl will work along with -so and -orb

2019-03-18 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
/msg18243.html > https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16889.html > > > On 3/18/2019 9:32 PM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: > > Dear Wien2k, > > I am trying to get the DOS for a system which i included -so and -orb. > My scf calculation success

[Wien] Reg: Will -qtl will work along with -so and -orb

2019-03-18 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I am trying to get the DOS for a system which i included -so and -orb. My scf calculation successfully completed with "runsp_lapw -so -orb -ec 0.01 -p". I tried "x lapw2 -qtl -so -orb -up -p". It is ended with an error "ERROR: -qtl and -orb switches are not compatible Unmatched

[Wien] Reg: File to get the number of electrons in majority and minority spin cases for d-orbital

2018-03-04 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2K, I am working on magnetic metallic systems which are having Mn atoms, which are responsible for magnetic nature in these systems. As these compounds are metallic in nature the arrived magnetism is due to the itinerant electrons. Here i just want to know the number of electrons in

[Wien] Reg: Limit of maximum number of K points to plot Fermi surfaces for different structures

2016-11-10 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k and XCrySDen, I am working on FCC compounds (which have four atoms in a unit cell) with Wien2k code. To get Fermi surface i used 44x 44x 44 K-mesh, which will create 2168 k points in the Brillouin Zone. With this number of K points, i get smooth Fermi surfaces. After this, i created

Re: [Wien] Reg: Calculation of McMillan-Hopfield parameter

2016-06-22 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
d from a band structure > calculation and the rigid-muffin-tin approx. > > On 06/22/2016 05:53 AM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: > >> Dear WIEN2k, >> >> Is it possible to calculate McMillan-Hopfield parameter directly with >> WIEN2k, which is used to calcul

[Wien] Reg: Calculation of McMillan-Hopfield parameter

2016-06-21 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear WIEN2k, Is it possible to calculate McMillan-Hopfield parameter directly with WIEN2k, which is used to calculate electron-phonon coupling of a particular superconducting material as given in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 74, 184519 (2006). I searched in the user guide. But there is no use. Thanking

[Wien] Reg: Difference in the total energy with and without including spin-orbit coupling

2016-05-20 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
> > Dear WIEN2k, > > I am working on six cubic metallic systems. I did total energy > calculations with including spin-orbit coupling and without including > spin-orbit coupling. The energy difference between these two type of > calculations is 0.70188367 Ry, 0.83293372 Ry, 0.96565226 Ry,

[Wien] Reg: Difference in the total energy with and without including spin-orbit coupling

2016-05-18 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear WIEN2k, I am working on six cubic metallic systems. I did total energy calculations with including spin-orbit coupling and without including spin-orbit coupling. The energy difference between these two type of calculations is 0.70188367 Ry, 0.83293372 Ry, 0.96565226 Ry, 0.8189581 Ry,

[Wien] Reg: Errors in the installation of Critic2 program

2016-02-24 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear wien2k, I facing some problem while the installation of criti2 program. I downloaded the program form https://github.com/aoterodelaroza/critic2 At the time of installation i am facing error as given bellow. Any body have experience with these type of errors. ifort

Re: [Wien] Reg: Critic program

2016-02-24 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
2AM +0530, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: > > Dear Wien2k, > > > > I am working on a magnetic compound of X2YZ type. I am trying to find the > > charge flow between the elements. From the previous mailing list i found > > that *X aim *can be useful to find the Bader charge fr

[Wien] Reg: Error while running band structure SP+SO case in parallel

2015-05-14 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I am getting error while calculating band structure in spin orbit case for a magnetic material. Here are the commands. For scf calculations i gave the following command *runsp_lapw -so -ec 0.01 -p* It completed successfully. After that i created case.klist_band and i gave Ef

[Wien] Reg: How to comment on the more interstitial DOS value at the fermi level

2015-01-10 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I am working on the Heusler compound. My compound is like X2YZ type. In the density of states (DOS) calculations i got the values as bellow at the fermi level. for total compound (X2YZ) 30.95 (states/Ry) For X 16.49 (States/Ry) For Y

[Wien] Reg: AFM structure in 111, 110 and 100

2014-05-31 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k. I am working on the Heusler (X2YZ) compounds. I want to generate different AFM structure (111, 110 and 100) files such that the direction of the Y atom layers should be in along x, along Y and along Z directions. Is it possible? Please give suggestions. Thank you in

[Wien] Reg: AFM calculations

2014-05-22 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2K, I am trying to do AFM calculations. I followed the user guide to set the AFM calculations. I got some error. Here i am giving the step by step information. 1. first i run init_lapw up to lstart in magnetic case. After that i copied my case.struct to

[Wien] Reg: Where to find spin moment for each orbital?

2014-04-07 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear WIEN2k, I am working on a magnetic compound. I got the total magnetic moment and each atom contribution to that magnetic moment. Now i want to calculate the orbital contributed magnetic moment as reported in table.1 of the following reference.

Re: [Wien] Reg: Where to find spin moment for each orbital?

2014-04-07 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
sreenivasa reddy wrote: Dear WIEN2k, I am working on a magnetic compound. I got the total magnetic moment and each atom contribution to that magnetic moment. Now i want to calculate the orbital contributed magnetic moment as reported in table.1 of the following reference. https

[Wien] Reg: How to find the Stoner parameter in stoner criteria?

2014-04-01 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear WIEN2k, Stoner criteria is IN(EF)/= 1. In this N(EF) is density of states value at the Fermi level and I is the Stoner parameter. I want to know how to calculate this Stoner parameter from first principles calculations. Thank you in advance. ___

Re: [Wien] Reg: How to find the Stoner parameter in stoner criteria?

2014-04-01 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
of the metal atom in the structure. Then you know the DOS value and you can use it for further calculation. 1 Nisan 2014 Salı tarihinde, Peram sreenivasa reddy peramsreeni...@gmail.com yazdı: Dear WIEN2k, Stoner criteria is IN(EF)/= 1. In this N(EF) is density of states value at the Fermi level

Re: [Wien] Reg: How to find the Stoner parameter in stoner criteria?

2014-04-01 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.014416 (page 3), http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/mailing_list/wien-digest. archive/summary_2002_II (search keyword stoner for the post by Mazin)]. On 4/1/2014 8:39 AM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: Dear WIEN2k, Stoner criteria is IN(EF)/= 1. In this N(EF

Re: [Wien] Reg: Fixed spin moment calculations

2014-03-31 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
. On 03/29/2014 01:17 PM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: Dear WIEN2k, I am working on magnetic compound. For my system i got total magnetic moment 1.95 bohr magneton. Now i want to do fixed spin moment calculations. My quires are 1). To do fixed spin moment

[Wien] Reg: Fixed spin moment calculations

2014-03-29 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear WIEN2k, I am working on magnetic compound. For my system i got total magnetic moment 1.95 bohr magneton. Now i want to do fixed spin moment calculations. My quires are 1). To do fixed spin moment calculations, first i have to initiate the calculations in spin

Re: [Wien] Reg: Fixed spin moment calculations

2014-03-29 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Sir, Thank you very much for your replay. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:55 PM, t...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote: Yes, this is the correct procedure. On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: Dear WIEN2k, I am working on magnetic compound. For my system i

Re: [Wien] How to do fixed magnetic moment calculations?

2014-03-09 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
08:19 AM, Peram sreenivasa reddy wrote: Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, I initiated the calculations in magnetic case. After initiating the calculations i gave run command as runfsm_lapw -m 1.95 -ec 0.01. In my case.scf file i got the magnetic moment value as 1.95 bohr magneton as i was gaven

Re: [Wien] How to do fixed magnetic moment calculations?

2014-03-05 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Peter Blaha, Thank you very much for your replay. I will get back to you with my results after using this command. Thanking you .. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Peter Blaha pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atwrote: runfsm -m XX Am 05.03.2014 06:56, schrieb Peram sreenivasa reddy: Dear

[Wien] Reg: Error while running x lapwso -band -dn

2013-07-28 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I want to run spin orbit calculations in magnetic case to my system (XY2Z2-type, tetragonal). scf completed successfully. But when i tried to run band i got error. My commands are.. x lapw1 -band -up x lapw1 -band -dn x lapwso -band -up x lapwso -band -dn when i

[Wien] Reg: problem with SOC in magnetic case

2013-06-26 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Wien2k, I am trying to run SO in magnetic case. In non-magnetic case SO completed with out any error. In magnetic case i got error like below when i run runsp_lapw -so. LAPW0 END LAPW1 END LAPW1 END LAPWSO END L2main - QTL-B Error After this i checked all error files

[Wien] Reg: Structure

2013-06-14 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear users, Is it possible to generate crystal structure with Wien2k which one have both centro symmetric (CS) type and Noncentro symmetric (NCS) type?. In both cases the positions of one atom are coinciding the positions of other atom. Is it possible to generate crystal

[Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-28 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear users, I got error like below while running SO calculation. Can i know how to rectify it. LAPW0 END LAPW1 END LAPW1 END LAPWSO END L2main - QTL-B Error Thank you in advance... ___ Wien mailing list

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-28 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
Dear Ghosh and Stefaan, Thank you very much for your replay. I completed SO for non magnetic case. Now i want to run SO in magnetic case. This error came while running in Magnetic case. Dear Ghosh sir, I tried your commands. Still same error is coming. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Stefaan

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-28 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at [mailto: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] *On Behalf Of *Peram sreenivasa reddy *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:33 PM *To:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users *Subject:* Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation ** ** Dear Ghosh and Stefaan, Thank

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-28 Thread Peram sreenivasa reddy
certainly in the format of your case.inso or similar. You should probably attached your struct file and someone else can help you. N.B., -ec 0.01 is not really useful in most cases, I suggest just using -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.0001. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Peram sreenivasa reddy