Maybe I've missed something because I'm coming late to this, but it
surprises me that people do not seem concerned about keeping track of
licenses (not just credit) for the data we'll host.
At least in the EU, recently compiled or modified databases are protected
by database rights. Maybe the WMF
Heya folks,
We unfortunately had to switch off language switching for anonymous
users because of caching issues and people seeing random languages on
wikidata.org because of it. It still works for logged-in users. We're
working on getting it back for anonymous users too. You can follow
Hoi,
It probably is another bug ... *Bug
42064*https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42064
- Make AbuseFilter aware of Wikibase content models. is not applicable
Thanks,
Gerard
On 16 November 2012 12:07, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.dewrote:
Heya folks,
We
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
It probably is another bug ... Bug 42064 - Make AbuseFilter aware of
Wikibase content models. is not applicable
Thanks,
Gerard
You are of course right...
Just to clarify, my concern is about externally made databases, regardless
of whether these are imported directly into Wikidata, or have been
incorporated into Wikipedia first and imported into Wikidata from there.
For example, the population data in Wikipedia's list of ceremonial English
counties
Just to clarify, my concern is about externally made databases, regardless
of whether these are imported directly into Wikidata, or have been
incorporated into Wikipedia first and imported into Wikidata from there. For
example, the population data in Wikipedia's list of ceremonial English
Il 16/11/2012 07:24, Katie Filbert ha scritto:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Snaevar snaevar-w...@gmx.com
mailto:snaevar-w...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to let you guys know that there is spam being added to
items (descriptions and labels) on the demo repo.
Thanks for
