Have anyone heard about a LoCloud project in Europeana? Its about
integration of Wikimedia services and content in a cloud service for
local glam institutions. It seems like the project was started
officially in March 2013.
LoCloud is a cloud service for small and medium sized institutions. It
There is a discussion on the cultural-partners list from 26th March 2013.
John
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Have anyone heard about a LoCloud project in Europeana? Its about
integration of Wikimedia services and content in a cloud service for
local
Speaking from DBpedia (not on behalf), we have been always trying to find
ways to contribute data back to wikipedia and If licencing is the only
issue here I am sure we can make any necessary arrangements.
imho the main scepticism so far was trust from the WIkipedia community to
load data in
Hoi,
Two things to consider; the Wikipedia community and the Wikidata community
are two separate entities. As far as I am concerned, Wikidata needs more
data to get to the tipping point where it becomes useful to users. I am
really vocal about both.
The license has traditionally been a sticking
Am 25.08.2013 19:19, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
If we have an IRI DV, considering that URLs are special IRIs, it seems clear
that IRI would be the best way of storing them.
The best way of storing them really depends on the storage platform. It may be a
string or something else.
I think the
Hi Daniel,
if I understand you correctly, you are in favour of equating datavalue
types and property types. This would solve indeed the problems at hand.
The reason why both kinds of types are distinct in SMW and also in
Wikidata is that property types are naturally more extensible than
Hi,
Maybe this is interesting as an import source for bibliographic info
http://blogs.ifla.org/bibliography/2013/08/06/german-national-library-offers-over-11-million-marc21-records-under-cc0-open-license/
Cheers,
Micru
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
This seems very interesting: maybe, there will be a time when Wikidata (or
similar) will host the bibliographic records
of thousands of libraries...
Right now, I'm not sure if we want to discuss a massive upload of these
records in WD,
because:
* they are in MARC, which is way more complex than
There are many such CC0 national bibliographies available, and other large
datasets, if the decision is made to import them.
See here for a list:
http://datahub.io/group/bibliographic
Here is a direct link to the British National Bibliography page:
http://bnb.bl.uk/
For further information
If Wikidata has an ambition to be a really reliable database, we should do
eveything we can to make it easy for users to use any source they want. In
this perspective, if we got datas with guaranted high quality, it make it
easy for Wikidatian to find and use these references for users. Entering a
On 8/26/13 4:34 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Two things to consider; the Wikipedia community and the Wikidata
community are two separate entities. As far as I am concerned,
Wikidata needs more data to get to the tipping point where it becomes
useful to users. I am really vocal about both.
If the problem is to automate bibliographic data importing, a solution is
what you propose, to import everything. Another one is to have an import
tool to automatically import the data for the item that needs it. In WP
they do that, there is a tool to import book/journal info by ISBN/doi. The
same
I know, I started a discussion about porting the bot to WIkidata in
scientific Journal Wikiproject. One answer I got : the bot owner had other
things to do in his life than running the bot and was not around very often
any more. Having everiyhing in Wikidata already will be a lot more reliable
and
Hoi,
As you may have noticed there are other people on the CC..
The not invented here refers to much of the Wiki world.. things get done
but much is done over and over again EVEN when cooperation is easy and
obvious. I have largely resigned myself to it, it is probably part of our
persona.
Hello All,
as an output of GSoC2013 project , Wikidata integration inside
DBpediahttp://wiki.dbpedia.org/gsoc2013/ideas/WikidataMappings?v=hz9
we
are happy to announce that an initial RDF DBpedia Dumps for Wikidata Data
is now available. (details and examples for each dump will be in the
download
Heya folks :)
Wikiyovage now has access to the data on Wikidata - meaning they got
phase 2. With this the first sister project is fully supported \o/ The
next sister projects will follow. More information on this soon.
We've also just updated the software here. This brings a number of bug
fixes
Hi,
great news!
Wiadomość napisana przez Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de w dniu
27 sie 2013, o godz. 00:05:
* Broken links to set sitelinks for Wikivoyage in the non-JavaScript
version have been fixed. ([[bugzilla:51914]], [[bugzilla:52095]])
Small correction: this affected all
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michał Łazowik mlazo...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
great news!
Wiadomość napisana przez Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de w
dniu 27 sie 2013, o godz. 00:05:
* Broken links to set sitelinks for Wikivoyage in the non-JavaScript
version have been fixed.
18 matches
Mail list logo
