Prior to viewing Markus Krötzsch's Wikidata page, I was unaware of the
Wikidata: A Free Collaborative Knowledgebase article [1] written by
Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. This is a very helpful article
that in my opinion should be featured on the Wikidata main page.
[1]
completely-self-servingYay! I would love to see it featured on the
Wikidata main page! Let's slashdot ACM :)/completely-self-serving
On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 6:11:57 AM ja...@j1w.xyz wrote:
Prior to viewing Markus Krötzsch's Wikidata page, I was unaware of the
Wikidata: A Free Collaborative
Back to Denny's original question:
Does anybody see a specific danger of abuse if living people get to edit
their own data right now? Entering wrong claims deliberately would maybe
not be the biggest issue here (since it is already in conflict with
other general policies -- we do not want
Hoi,
English Wikipedia is not Wikipedia. It certainly is not any other project.
I certainly do not want the policies of English Wikipedia. It is bad enough
for en,wp itself
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 January 2015 at 19:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider pfpschnei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wikipedia has
Also, when adding information to Wikipedia/Wikidata, it is best practice (but
not mandatory) to provide external references backing up your claims.
Nicolas.
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 10:26 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
pfpschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia has already
Markus, Denny and Wikidatans,
I don't, Markus. In the information age, this seems to be a widespread and
helpful practice in general (e.g. in LinkedIn and for some medical
records,, for example).
On the benefits of this side, this is a way for Wikidata to get most
accurate, and potentially,
On 7 January 2015 at 20:29, Nicolas Torzec torz...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Also, when adding information to Wikipedia/Wikidata, it is best practice
(but not mandatory) to provide external references backing up your claims.
Some property values are self referencing; VIAF and ORCID identifiers,
Irrespective of the general policy discussion, I have now been bold and
changed my item and user page to record that relationship as by my
earlier suggestion (as copied below):
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18618630
I was wondering if, given that we have single signon, website account
on
Hoi,
Markus, is there no public domain picture for you... Please let it be a
flattering picture.. and please add it yourself...
grin I love the argument people make when they want to imply that you are
not that good looking /grin
Thanks,
Gerard
Wikipedia has already addressed this question. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autobiography. In summary, one should
not add or change information about oneself, unless the change could not be
considered to be non-controversial or there is some reason that a change
should be made
P.S. I also should declare a COI on this discussion: I am Q18618630. --
Markus
On 07.01.2015 15:25, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Back to Denny's original question:
Does anybody see a specific danger of abuse if living people get to edit
their own data right now? Entering wrong claims deliberately
I can't imagine anyone reading these mails who has never hit the edit
button at least once on some random Wikimedia project. Could it possibly be
entertaining otherwise? For the sorry few who need to read these mails for
their work (whatever that may be), they have my sympathy.
On Sun, Jan 4,
Jasper Deng, 04/01/2015 08:40:
@Andy: no, the terms of use /are/ the minimum because since a user must
legally accept them when editing a project, everyone is bound by them by
virtue of editing. Local projects cannot override that.
Correct in general, but not for the last paragraph of article
Hoi,
You say this based on what? As far as I am aware Andy is right.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 January 2015 at 08:40, Jasper Deng jas...@jasperswebsite.com wrote:
@Andy: no, the terms of use *are* the minimum because since a user must
legally accept them when editing a project, everyone is
Love this thread - Happy New Year, to all of you TOU groupies! I bet half
of the lurkers on this list never even clicked on the meta page
Half of the lurkers on this list probably don't even edit Wikimedia.
John Lewis
--
John Lewis
___
Wikidata-l
Lydia, I believe you meant to say override, not overwrite. Freudian
slip, but I found it rather funny (and could think of multiple instances
where that might even be true).
Jane
2015-01-03 12:46 GMT+01:00 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Flaken
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Flaken Aldnonymous
aldnonymo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On [[m:TOU]] already explain what you should do.
That is the default for Wikimedia projects. An individual project can
overwrite that if wanted.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
The terms of use are the minimum requirements. Each wiki may have more
requirements.
Joe
On 2 Jan 2015 10:16, Flaken Aldnonymous aldnonymo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On [[m:TOU]] already explain what you should do.
Terms of use - Meta
[image: image]
Terms of use - Meta
Translate this page
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Lydia, I believe you meant to say override, not overwrite. Freudian
slip, but I found it rather funny (and could think of multiple instances
where that might even be true).
Heh yeah.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher -
It looks like community Jeremy commented is wikidata community whether
to opt-out paid contribs disclosure or not.
-Yena Hong (Revi)
http://www.revi.pe.kr
-- Sent from Android --
2015. 1. 4. 오전 12:35에 Flaken Aldnonymous aldnonymo...@yahoo.com님이 작성:
Jeremy Baron you might want to read this
Jeremy Baron you might want to read this
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment
Also, we already done RFC for this here Talk:Terms of use/Paid contributions
amendment - Meta
| |
| | | | | | | |
| Talk:Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment -
On 3 January 2015 at 18:13, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com wrote:
The terms of use are the minimum requirements. Each wiki may have more
requirements.
No, they are the *default* requirements. Each wiki may have *different*
requirements.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
I see, so why don't Wikidata just make derivative version of it? It's simple
and easy to make.
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:39 AM, Andy Mabbett
a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 3 January 2015 at 18:13, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com wrote:
The terms of use are the
@Andy: no, the terms of use *are* the minimum because since a user must
legally accept them when editing a project, everyone is bound by them by
virtue of editing. Local projects cannot override that.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 3 January
On [[m:TOU]] already explain what you should do.
Terms of use - Meta
| |
| | | | | | | |
| Terms of use - MetaTranslate this page Other languages: |
| |
| View on meta.wikimedia.org | Preview by Yahoo |
| |
| |
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014 6:38 AM, Denny Vrandečić
I found out the other day that there's an item about myself, and I wanted
to edit it, and got a weird feeling about it. So I raised the question on
the project chat
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#COI_and_editing
and got told that an RFC would be a good idea. So I tried one.
26 matches
Mail list logo
